All Natural Marketer Found to have Violated the FTC Act

December 14, 2016

all-naturalOn December 5, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) issued an opinion finding that California Naturel, Inc. (“CNI”) had violated the FTC Act by falsely marketing its sunscreen products as “all natural,” despite the presence of a synthetic substance.  CNI sought to avoid summary judgment by arguing that after the FTC had commenced the underlying investigation, CNI added disclaimers to its webpage which cured any alleged deceptive representations.  However, the FTC noted that the disclaimers were posted on the bottom of the webpage, well below the product ingredients list, and even below the “Add to Cart” button.  As a result, the FTC found the disclaimers to be insufficient to defeat a claim of misrepresentation.

Why did the FTC Find CNI’s All-Natural Claims Misleading?

All-Natural Marketer Violated the FTC Act

CNI marketed its sunscreen as “All Natural.”  Although CNI’s sunscreen product did contain natural ingredients, 8% of the sunscreen was composed of a synthetic substance.  In finding that CNI violated the FTC Act, the Commission observed:

[CNI] also argues that there is no regulatory definition that specifies the percentage of natural ingredients required in order to describe a product as “natural.”  While true, this argument misses the mark.  [CNI] does not merely claim that its product is “natural”; it expressly asserts that its sunscreen is “all natural” and that it “uses only the purest, most luxurious and effective ingredients found in nature.” By [CNI’s] own admission, that is not true.

In holding that CNI violated the FTC Act, the FTC issued an order prohibiting CNI from misrepresenting the ingredients of its products as “all natural” in the future where such products contain synthetic substances.  In addition, the Commission warned CNI that it must always have competent and reliable evidence to support any claims that its products are “natural” or beneficial to health.

Protect Yourself

FTC scrutiny of “all-natural” product claims has intensified.  We recently blogged about four separate settlements that the FTC reached with other “all-natural” marketers.  In this regulatory climate, it is imperative that all natural marketers review their marketing and information collection practices with experienced and competent counsel.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Telemarketing Law practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your all natural marketing practices in general, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

The Honest Company Faces False Advertising Class Action

Quaker Oats Faces False Advertising Class Action

FTC Wins Health Benefit-Related Deceptive Advertising Lawsuit


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

Trending Topics


Temu on Trademark Rampage

Let it be known: Temu will use all legal means necessary to protect its trademark rights. Since its stateside launch last September, Temu has already

Read More »
ai tcpa

The Impact of AI on TCPA Litigation

On November 15, 2023, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) voted in favor of undertaking a formal inquiry to evaluate the impact that artificial intelligence (“AI”)

Read More »
gambling advertising

Gambling Advertising and the Law

In late August, DraftKings was fined $94,440 in Maryland for allegedly advertising to underage fantasy sports players. A little over one month later, PointsBet was

Read More »