FTC Announces Four False “All-Natural” Claim Settlements

July 14, 2016

all-naturalOn Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced its settlement with four separate companies, each alleged to have falsely advertised its respective products as “all-natural.”  The products, including sunscreen, shampoo, and body lotion, are all alleged to have contained some synthetic ingredients despite the companies’ claims that such products are “all-natural.”

What are the Settlement Terms for Falsely Advertising Products as “All-Natural?”

FTC Settles False “All-Natural” Claim Investigations

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreements, each of the companies is prohibited from making any claims regarding the “natural” ingredients of their respective products “unless the representation is non-misleading, including that, at the time such representation is made the [company] possesses and relies upon competent and reliable evidence . . . .”  Fortunately for the companies, none are required to pay any damages or penalties.

Protect Yourself

We recently blogged that the FTC has been cracking down on false advertising campaigns across the country.  Although the subject four companies avoided paying damages to the federal government, the penalties typically sought in such actions, whether initiated by the FTC or state regulators, can be quite severe.  Because of this risk, it is important for marketers to engage competent counsel prior to commencing any advertising campaign, particularly those involving all-natural claims.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Telemarketing Law practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your marketing practices in general, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Marketers Sued by FTC for Weight-Loss Product Advertising Practices

Carrot Neurotechnology Settles Deceptive Advertising Claims with FTC

Court Affirms FTC’s Restriction on Health and Disease-Related Claims by POM Wonderful

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
TCPA rules black telephone on desk telemarketing consumer

TCPA Rules to Change?

A Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) bill first introduced in the United States Senate has been given new life as Congress and federal agencies continue

Read More »

Trending Topics

TCPA rules black telephone on desk telemarketing consumer
Blog

TCPA Rules to Change?

A Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) bill first introduced in the United States Senate has been given new life as Congress and federal agencies continue

Read More »
strikethrough pricing sale item california store price
Blog

California’s Strikethrough Price Law Takes Center Stage  

Similar to our recent piece, there has been an increase in California-based litigation concerning advertising products at allegedly discounted prices and lawsuits claiming that this practice violates California’s laws on false advertising (“Strikethrough Price Law”) have followed. Below,

Read More »