Quaker Oats Faces False Advertising Class Action

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

May 3, 2016

false-advertisingLast week, two putative class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and the Northern District of California, respectively, alleging that the Quaker Oats Company, as well as its parent company PepsiCo, Inc. (collectively, “Quaker Oats”), falsely advertise Quaker Oats brand oat products as “100% natural” despite the presence of “a potent herbicide that last year was declared a probable human carcinogen by the cancer research arm of the World Health Organization.”  Both lawsuits do not presently seek monetary damages, but do request full refunds for consumers and corrective advertising by Quaker Oats.

Why is Quaker Oats Facing a Class Action Lawsuit for Alleged False Advertising?

Quaker Oats Faces False Advertising Class Action Over presence of Glyphosate

The complaints allege that Quaker Oats has falsely advertised three specific products as being “100% natural” despite the presence of glyphosate, a “potent herbicide”: (1) Quaker Oats Old-Fashioned; (2) Quaker Oats Quick 1-Minute; and (3) Quaker Steel Cut Oats.  Both lawsuits acknowledge that there is nothing unlawful about Quaker Oats’ use of glyphosate as a pesticide.  However, the complaints allege that “Quaker [Oats] knows that consumers seek out and wish to purchase whole, natural foods that do not contain chemicals, and that consumers will pay more for foods they believe to be natural than they will pay for foods that they do not believe to be natural.”  Therefore “[b]y deceiving consumers about the nature, quality, and/or ingredients of its Quaker Oats, [defendant] is able to sell a greater volume of Quaker Oats, to charge higher prices for Quaker Oats, and to take away market share from competing products, thereby increasing its own sales and profits.”

Quaker Oats has yet to be served in either action.  In response to the actions, Quaker Oats released a statement which explains that the company did not add glyphosate during any part of the oat milling process but that it might be applied by farmers to certain grains before harvest.  Therefore, according to Quaker Oats, “[a]ny levels of glyphosate that may remain are trace amounts and significantly below any limits which have been set by the [Environmental Protection Agency] as safe for human consumption.”

Protect Yourself

Last fall, we blogged about the Federal Trade Commission’s vigorous crackdown on health-related claims made in product advertising.  It is important that companies, as well as their marketing partners, consult with competent legal counsel to understand the laws involved in advertising products to the public.

If you are interested in learning about our litigation services, please visit the Full Service Litigation practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your marketing practices in general, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Dietary Supplement Company Settles FTC False Advertising Suit for $9 Million

The Magic Pill: FTC Settles Deceptive Marketing Action Involving Dietary Supplements Claimed to Treat Children’s Speech Disorders

FTC Files Lawsuit Against Gerber for Deceptive Advertising

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin