FTC Settles Mosquito Shield Band False Advertising Litigation

May 25, 2016

false-advertisingOn Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced its settlement with Viatek Consumer Products Group Inc. (“Viatek”) and its principal Lou Lentine (“Lentine”) concerning claims that their “Mosquito Shield” wristband prevents wearers from being bitten by mosquitos.  The FTC commenced litigation against Viatek and Lentine in February, 2015.  After a failed motion to dismiss by the defendants and some discovery, the parties agreed on the terms of a settlement and are now seeking court approval.

How did Viatek Falsely Advertise its Product?

False Advertising Claims against Viatek

According to the complaint filed by the FTC, Viatek advertises that its Mosquito Shield product prevents mosquito bites despite lacking any competent and reliable scientific evidence to support this claim.  The allegedly false representations have not only been made in print media and on the Internet, but also repeatedly on the home shopping television network HSN.  Moreover, according to the complaint, Viatek’s principal Lentine was subject to a 2003 FTC Order that required any future advertising claims made by Lentine (or any company that he worked for) be supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement with the FTC, Viatek and Lentine are jointly and severally responsible to pay the FTC $300,000.  In addition, neither may make any future advertising claims about products without first obtaining competent and reliable scientific evidence which supports such claims.

Protect Yourself

As we previously blogged, the FTC has been cracking down on national deceptive advertising campaigns.  The penalties sought in such actions, whether initiated by the FTC or state regulators, can be quite severe.  As a result of this risk to marketers, it is important to engage competent counsel prior to commencing any marketing campaign, particularly those involving health benefit-related claims.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Telemarketing Law practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your marketing practices in general, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

New World Order for E-Cigs

Quaker Oats Faces False Advertising Class Action

FTC Drops the Hammer on Education Lead Generator


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

TCPA vicarious tcpa law woman holding cellphone telemarketing laws

TCPA Vicarious Liability

An Illinois federal district court judge recently held that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) may be vicariously liable for alleged Telephone Consumer

Read More »