FTC Drops the Hammer on Education Lead Generator

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

April 29, 2016

lead-generatorThis week, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that it has settled charges against

Gigats.com and its owners and operators (“Gigats”), resolving the agency’s first ever enforcement action against an education lead generator.

What were the FTC’s charges against the lead generator and what are the terms of the settlement?

According to the Complaint, the FTC alleged that the lead generator’s violations of the FTC Act consisted of:

  • Gathering job announcements and/or listings posted on the Internet by other companies, employers and government agencies, respectively, and presenting the listings on its own website, where it appeared to consumers that Gigats would accept job applications;
  • In reality, the employers had not authorized Gigats to accept applications on their behalf, and
  • Instead, Gigats gathered the information provided by the would-be job seekers, created targeted leads, and subsequently steered those consumers toward education institutions, to whom Gigats had sold the leads.

The FTC has now submitted a proposed stipulation of settlement to the court for approval that provides for the following:

  • A $90.2 million judgment that will be suspended upon payment of $360,000;
  • Prohibiting Gigats from making any future misrepresentations similar to those set forth above;
  • Barring Gigats from transferring consumer information to third-parties without first clearly disclosing to consumers that such information will be transferred; and
  • Prohibiting Gigats from using any consumer data obtained through these means unless consumers provide the requisite affirmative consent for Gigats to do so.

Protecting Lead Generators From Deceptive Marketing Suits

As we have previously blogged, the FTC has been incredibly active in pursuing unscrupulous marketers, including online dating and social media websites.  Using its enforcement powers under the FTC Act and other regulatory laws and rules, the FTC has been especially vigilant in its efforts to ensure regulatory compliance with respect to the collection, use, and sharing of consumer data.  In order to avoid a similar fate to that of Gigats, it is imperative to engage knowledgeable counsel to ensure that your practices are fully compliant with all applicable state and federal laws.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your data collection or Internet marketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

New York Attorney General to Investigate T-Mobile for Deceptive Marketing Practices

Direct Marketer Pays $8 million for Alleged Deceptive Practices, TSR Violations

Subway Settles Sandwich Length Deceptive Trade Practices Lawsuit

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin