Sports Illustrated, Sweepstakes App Provider Announce March Madness Bracket Challenge

March 14, 2016

sweepstakes-appLast Wednesday, Time Inc.’s “Sports Illustrated” brand and sweepstakes app provider Kizzang LLC (“Kizzang”) announced their upcoming $25 million College Basketball Bracket Challenge.

With potential prizes in the millions (or billions) of dollars, how can sweepstakes sponsors minimize their legal risk?

Kizzang’s Sweepstakes App and Sports Illustrated 2016 College Basketball Bracket Challenge

Formed in 2013, Kizzang is a sweepstakes app provider that sponsors games, sweepstakes and contests through its Web and mobile platforms.  On March 9, 2016, Kizzang and Sports Illustrated announced their partnership for this month’s “Sports Illustrated 2016 College Basketball Bracket Challenge.”

Like other March Madness contest of its kind, any participant who can correctly predict the winner of all 63 games in the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament will win a cash prize – in Kizzang and Sports Illustrated’s case, a $25,000,000 prize.  The promotion is accessible through Kizzang’s downloadable sweepstakes app.

March Madness Contest Mishap

As we reported previously, the sponsor of another March Madness contest faced legal issues before the promotion even came to fruition.  When Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”) wanted to offer a similar March Madness contest with SCA Promotions, Inc. (“SCA”) in 2014 with a $1 billion prize, Yahoo changed its plans and worked out a deal with Quicken Loans (and without SCA). SCA sued Yahoo, alleging breach of contract and claiming that Yahoo owed SCA nearly $10 million.

The district court ultimately granted Yahoo’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the sweepstakes lawsuit.  Although Yahoo prevailed at the federal district court level, SCA has appealed the ruling.

Legal Concerns for Sweepstakes Sponsors

Sponsoring a promotional contest or sweepstakes app or website can come with a number of legal risks – sometimes before the applicable promotion even gets off of the ground.  Sponsors should ensure that they have taken every precaution to conduct their contest or sweepstakes in accordance with applicable regulations and third-party agreements.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, or you are pursuing a sweepstakes-related venture, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Related Blog Posts:

Yahoo Prevails in Sweepstakes Fulfillment Contract Dispute

Yahoo Brings Fraud Counterclaims in March Madness Sweepstakes Lawsuit

Taylor Swift Settles Promotional Sweepstakes Dispute

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »

Trending Topics

Blog

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »