SCA Promotions to Appeal Loss in Sweepstakes Lawsuit

sweepstakes law
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We’re going into overtime. Last Wednesday, prize promotion and risk management company SCA Promotions, Inc. (“SCA”) gave notice that it intends to appeal a Dallas federal court’s judgment to the Fifth Circuit in connection with a botched billion-dollar 2014 March Madness sweepstakes and SCA’s ensuing sweepstakes lawsuit against Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”).

Is this Round 2 for Yahoo and SCA?

Questions about trademark law?

Call us today at (212) 246-0900.

Our initial consultations are free.

Agreement Gone Wrong Leads to Sweepstakes Lawsuit

Yahoo wanted to offer a March Madness sweepstakes in 2014 where any participant who could correctly predict the winner of all 63 games in the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament would win a $1 billion prize. Yahoo planned to pay an $11 million fee to SCA, who agreed to pay out the full $1 billion prize in the event of a winner, with certain other conditions. Yahoo made an initial scheduled payment of $1.1 million to SCA soon after signing the contract.

In January 2014, when Quicken Loans publicly announced that it was teaming up with Warren Buffet and Berkshire Hathaway to sponsor a very similar “Billion Dollar Bracket Challenge,” Yahoo changed its plans and worked out a deal with Quicken to become a co-sponsor of its promotion – and without SCA. That same month, SCA initiated a sweepstakes lawsuit against Yahoo, alleging breach of contract and claiming that Yahoo owed SCA nearly $10 million.

As we reported earlier this month, the district court ultimately granted Yahoo’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the sweepstakes lawsuit, ruling that Yahoo is actually entitled to a refund of $550,000 from SCA. Last Wednesday, undoubtedly dissatisfied with the ruling, SCA filed its notice of appeal with the district court.

Sweepstakes Lawsuits: Best to Be Avoided

Although Yahoo prevailed at the federal district court level, the wheels of litigation continue to spin, and the fate of Yahoo’s contractual obligations to SCA will once again be determined by a court of law. For sponsors of sweepstakes and promotional contests hoping to avoid sweepstakes lawsuits of their own, it makes good business and legal sense to speak with an experienced marketing attorney before launching a promotion or signing any related agreements.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, pursuing a sweepstakes-related venture, or if you have been served with legal process in connection with your marketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Yahoo Prevails in Sweepstakes Fulfillment Contract Dispute

Yahoo Brings Fraud Counterclaims in March Madness Sweepstakes Lawsuit

Sweepstakes Marketing: Don’t Be the Odd Man Out

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin