TSR Regulations to Ban Certain Telemarketing Payment Methods

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

November 23, 2015

tsr-regulationsLast week, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC” or “Commission”) amended its Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”) regulations to, among other things, add new outbound and inbound telemarketing payment method prohibitions.

Which payment methods did the Commission ban?

TSR Regulations Include Ban on Remotely Created Payment Orders

With the FTC’s recent rulemaking, it is now an abusive telemarketing practice under the TSR regulations to create a “remotely created payment order” as a telemarketing payment method. The Commission defines “remotely created payment order” as “any payment instruction or order drawn on a person’s account that is (a) created by the payee or the payee’s agent and (b) deposited into or cleared through the check clearing system.” The definition is meant to include remotely created checks.

Referencing scams for phony medical discount products, advance fee loans, credit card interest rate reduction services and magazine subscriptions, the FTC found that remotely created payment orders create a “persistent, ongoing and substantial harm” to consumers when used as a telemarketing payment method. Because remotely created payment orders are initiated by the merchant (and not the consumer), perpetrators of fraud frequently use this payment method to extract money from consumers without permission.

Ban on Cash-to-Cash Money Transfers and Cash Reload Mechanisms

Additionally, the TSR regulations now ban the acceptance of “cash-to-cash money transfers” or “cash reload mechanisms” as payment for goods or services offered or sold through telemarketing. The FTC was particularly concerned with the anonymity and irrevocability of these telemarketing payment methods.

“Cash-to-cash money transfers” are a type of wire transfer defined by the Commission as an “electronic transfer of the value of cash received from one person to another person in a different location that is sent by a money transfer provider and received in the form of cash.” The term includes remittance transfers, but does not include electronic fund transfers or gift cards.

The FTC defines “cash reload mechanism” as a “device, authorization code, personal identification number, or other security measure that makes it possible for a person to convert cash into an electronic form that can be used to add funds to a general-use prepaid card, or an account with a payment intermediary.” Under the express terms of the rulemaking, please note that the TSR’s new cash-to-cash money transfer and cash reload mechanism prohibitions do not extend to Internet-based transactions.

Expanded Advance Fee Ban

The TSR previously prohibited collecting advanced fees for services promising to recover losses incurred by consumers in a previous telemarketing transaction. Last week’s revisions expanded the coverage of the existing advance fee ban on recovery services to include losses incurred in any prior transaction, not just telemarketing transactions.

The Commission’s expanded advance fee ban is meant to address the widespread migration of frauds to other communication channels made possible by new technologies, including Internet websites and email.

Telemarketers: Pay Attention to Telemarketing Payment Method Prohibitions

The speed and convenience of newer payment methods may appeal to certain operators in the telemarketing space. However, before initiating telemarketing phone calls or delivering commercial SMS text messages that encourage consumers to use a novel payment method, inbound and outbound telemarketers should ensure that they are compliant with the recently amended Telemarketing Sales Rule and other application regulations.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, or need to review your telemarketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

New FTC Telemarketing Rules Coming Soon?

New TCPA Rules Effective October 16, 2013

FTC Secures Huge Telemarketing Judgment

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin