FTC Secures Huge Telemarketing Judgment

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

697868_56395757The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently entered a judgment against a telemarketing corporation, NHS Systems, Inc., and five principals, for violating the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act and associated enforcement regulations, laid out in the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR).   The defendants were accused of operating a telemarketing campaign, in which they misrepresented themselves as governmental entities and required consumers to sign up and pay for healthcare programs in exchange for the promise of future tax rebates or other monetary benefits.  In addition to there not being any tax rebates or other benefits associated with the programs, the FTC alleged that the defendants withdrew funds from consumers’ accounts without their approval or any notice thereof.

Court Findings

According to the opinion of the court, the defendants violated § 5(a) of the FTC Act and several TSR regulations by:

  1. expressly claiming or representing that they were calling on behalf of federal agencies, which was false and a material misrepresentation;
  2. unjustifiably offering government grants and refunds, which was false and a material misrepresentation;
  3. assuring consumers that they would not be charged or the charges would be offset by deposits into their accounts, which was materially false;
  4. underrepresenting the cost of joining and maintaining their discount healthcare program; and
  5. charging consumers for the program without notice or authorization.

Court Awards Permanent Injunctive and Monetary Relief

As a result of its findings, the court ordered that the defendants be enjoined from: 1) participating in any future telemarking campaigns; 2) using the billing information collected from consumers in any way contrary to the order; and 3) making, expressly or by implication, any representation that is false or misleading to consumers.  Additionally, the court ordered the disgorgement of all proceeds derived from the alleged TSR violations, in the amount of $6,879,162.22.  All of the named defendants were held jointly and severally liable for the monetary penalty designated by the court, which was ordered to be paid in full within 10 business days from the date of the court’s order.

The complaint against NHS Systems is part of a larger trend of regulatory action within the telemarketing space and is not limited to the FTC.  The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has similar telemarketing regulations codified in its Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which we have previously discussed in this blog.  In light of this action, and the general regulatory trend (on a state and federal level), telemarketers should review their marketing practices (and those of their respective affiliates) to ensure compliance with FTC, FCC and state telemarketing regulations.  Entities that fail to comply with applicable regulations may find themselves facing investigation and possible injunctive and monetary penalties.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your telemarketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

Attorney Advertising

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin