TCPA Lawyers Take Note: New Proposed Caller ID Rules

March 14, 2017

tcpa-lawyerThe Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). The proposed rules would institute new caller ID processes aimed at facilitating the blocking of fraudulent robocalls.  In essence, the FCC’s proposed rules seek to make “spoofing” more difficult for unscrupulous telemarketers and IRS scam artists.  Spoofing is a process through which fake caller ID information is used to mask or misrepresent the caller’s true identity.  If the FCC’s new rules go into effect, TCPA lawyers should advise their telemarketing clients that telephone service providers will be given increased power to prevent caller ID spoofing and that, as a result, “false positive” blocking may occur.

What are the FCC’s New Proposed TCPA Rules?

First, the FCC has proposed a rule that will allow telephone service providers to “block calls when the subscriber to a particular telephone number requests that calls originating from that number be blocked.”  Additionally, the FCC has proposed a process that “authorizes providers to block calls from three categories of numbers: invalid numbers, valid numbers that are not allocated to a voice service provider, and valid numbers that are allocated but not assigned to a subscriber.”  In effect, telephone service providers, whom the FCC notes have “intimate knowledge of the North American Numbering Plan,” will be given the power to block telephone calls based on their knowledge of who such numbers are assigned to.  Please note that in situations where legitimate calls are blocked, the FCC has proposed a challenge mechanism for callers who may have been blocked in error.

TCPA Attorneys and Their Clients Must Monitor the FCC’s Proposal

Last summer, we blogged about the FCC’s call for an industry “Strike Force” to combat robocalls.  In October of last year, the Strike Force submitted a report to the FCC with suggestions on how to better combat unwanted telemarketing robocalls.  The FCC’s new proposed robocall rules represent the codification of some of the proposals made by the Strike Force.  TCPA attorneys and their carrier/telemarketing clients will have 45 days from the date of publication to provide comments to the FCC concerning its proposed new rules.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Telemarketing Law practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your telemarketing practices in general, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Fax Marketing and the TCPA

Medical Supply Company Hires TCPA Attorney to Handle Class Action Suit

FCC: No Additional TCPA Consent Required for Certain Calls to Utility Customers

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »

Trending Topics

Blog

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »