Have You Been Sued By XMission?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

March 13, 2017

xmissionWe are witnessing a spike in both federal and state unsolicited commercial email lawsuits across the country.  In particular, many suits have been filed in the Utah federal district courts by XMission, L.C. (“XMission”), a Utah-based Internet Service Provider, against advertisers, email marketers, and their respective affiliates, for alleged violations of the CAN-SPAM Act (“CAN-SPAM”).

The XMission complaints typically allege materially false or misleading email message headers.  More specifically, XMission generally alleges that: (1) headers contain false or misleading inducement language; (2) headers falsely create the appearance of an existing relationship; (3) headers contain a generic “from” name; (4) the commercial email message is sent from a privacy-protected domain name; (5) marketers employ invalid or unregistered email sender domains; or (6) marketers have sent the subject email message(s) using a URL which was registered for a purpose that violates the domain registrar’s terms of service.   XMission often requests a temporary restraining order at the outset of its lawsuits, seeking to enjoin defendant marketers from sending future email to XMission clients.

What Should You Do If You Have Been Sued by XMission or Another ISP?

Because CAN-SPAM does not generally allow for a private right of action, the vast majority of cases are brought by Internet Service Providers.  In addition, Attorneys General and the Federal Trade Commission are also authorized to bring CAN-SPAM lawsuits.  Because the stakes are so high, it is critical to take the right steps when you first learn that you or your business has been  named in a CAN-SPAM suit, both to preserve critical defenses and to avoid prejudice to your case.

Upon learning of the filing, or threat of filing, of a CAN-SPAM suit by an entity such as XMission, it is critical that you do not: (1) speak with your adversary, who may look to extract information harmful to your position; (2) issue press releases; (3) speak with employees, marketing partners, advertisers or others in the industry until after you have had the opportunity to speak with an experienced marketing law attorney; or (4) destroy, tamper with, or create documents.

How To Avoid A Spam Lawsuit?

There are certain best practices that can be implemented to minimize the risk of becoming involved in a “spam” lawsuit.  Specifically, advertisers should confirm that their marketers are taking proper steps to maintain strict CAN-SPAM compliance.  Likewise, marketers should ensure that they have proper protocols in place to both ensure their own compliance and ensure that their affiliates are compliant with CAN-SPAM regulations.  Proper indemnity agreements are also critical.  Above all, it is most important to work with experienced email marketing counsel before the launch of any campaign in order to implement the practices and procedures necessary to prevent the sending of unlawful commercial email, and by extension the filing of a CAN-SPAM lawsuit.

If you are interested in this topic, or have been served with a CAN-SPAM lawsuit or demand letter, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Defending a Spam Lawsuit


Have you Been Sued by Harold Hoffman?


Proxy Domain Registration May Violate The CAN-SPAM Act

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin