Strip Club Shows Off Assets in Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

February 9, 2016

trademark-infringementLast Wednesday, TTNA, Inc. (“TTNA”), owner of the Baby Dolls Saloon strip clubs in Texas, filed a federal trademark infringement lawsuit against New York-based Baby Dolls Cabaret Ltd. (“Baby Dolls Cabaret”).

Can TTNA strip Baby Dolls Cabaret of its name (and profits)?

TTNA’s Clubs and Trademark Registrations

TTNA is the owner of strip clubs named Baby Dolls Saloon in Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas, as well as six federally registered BABY DOLLS and BABY DOLLS-formative word marks (two registrations each for BABY DOLLS, BABY DOLLS SALOON and BABY DOLLS TOPLESS SALOON) (the “Marks”).

The Marks – all filed in 2000 by D. Burch, Inc. and later assigned to TTNA – cover night club services and “entertainment services, in the nature of adult topless stage revues and performances.” According to filings made with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), TTNA’s predecessor-in-interest began using the Marks in commerce at least as early as 1980.

Baby Dolls Cabaret and TTNA’s Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

In August 2014, Baby Dolls Cabaret (a strip club) apparently opened its doors in Fredonia, New York. Between August and October 2015, TTNA allegedly delivered cease-and-desist correspondence to Baby Dolls Cabaret. However, as of this writing, it appears that Baby Dolls Cabaret has not ceased operations or changed its name.

On February 3, 2016, TTNA initiated a civil action against Baby Dolls Cabaret in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas for alleged trademark infringement, false advertising and false designation of origin (Case No. 3:16-cv-00305-M). TTNA is seeking enhanced monetary damages from Baby Dolls Cabaret’s alleged infringement of the Marks, disgorgement of profits and injunctive relief to prevent Baby Dolls Cabaret from using the Marks, the identifier “Baby Dolls” or any confusing variation thereof.

Naming Your Business or Brand? Proceed with Caution

Most entrepreneurs are well aware of the time and resources that go into keeping a business afloat, from business entity formation costs, to rent, payroll, utilities and insurance. As the above-mentioned case demonstrates, it is also essential that businesses conduct a thorough trademark clearance search before committing to a new business or brand name.

Unanticipated trademark infringement lawsuits can prove fatal. Therefore, as early as possible in the creative process, names, logos, designs, slogans and other business branding features should be carefully vetted by an experienced intellectual property attorney to minimize the risk of unwelcome legal surprises down the road from third-party brand owners.

If you are naming a business, branding a new product/service or involved in a trademark dispute, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

PornHub Advertising in Crosshairs for Sloppy Trademark Clearance

Registering Trademarks for Phrases and Slogans

Klein Moynihan Turco Scores Major Trademark Infringement Win


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
FTSA TCPA Telemarketing telemarketer note pad lawsuit

FTSA Lawsuit Update

Readers of our blog may recall a recent piece in which we discussed a Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (“FTSA”) lawsuit pending in the United States

Read More »

Trending Topics

FTSA TCPA Telemarketing telemarketer note pad lawsuit

FTSA Lawsuit Update

Readers of our blog may recall a recent piece in which we discussed a Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (“FTSA”) lawsuit pending in the United States

Read More »