Dietary Supplement Company Settles FTC False Advertising Suit for $9 Million

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

January 28, 2015

dietary supplementEarlier this week, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) reached a $9 million settlement agreement with Pure Health LLC, Genesis Today, Inc. and Lindsey Duncan, CEO of Genesis Today, concerning the marketing of their dietary supplement products.

The parties sell a variety of dietary supplements and food products directly to online consumers, as well as through third-party retail stores, such as Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club.  The FTC’s complaint, filed in federal district court in Texas, alleges that the defendants used false advertisements and deceptive practices to increase sales of the dietary supplement Green Coffee Bean Extract (“GCBE”).

Unsubstantiated “Secret Weapon” Claims

As part of the subject advertising campaign, Mr. Duncan appeared on nationally televised shows, such as The Dr. Oz Show and The View, where he claimed that GCBE could cause substantial weight loss without consumers having to diet or exercise.  Such ads featured claims that customers could lose 17 pounds and 16% of their body fat in 12 weeks.  In-store displays labeled GCBE as “The Dieter’s Secret Weapon.”

The FTC contends that the defendants’ health benefit claims were false and unsubstantiated, constituting deceptive acts or practices and the making of false advertisements in or affecting commerce, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the FTC Act, respectively.  The Commission reached a similar conclusion just last month.

Failure to Disclose Ties to Endorsed Dietary Supplement Products

During his television appearances, and on various websites, Mr. Duncan presented himself as an authority on health foods and nutrition—“one of the world’s leading experts on superfoods, herbal medicine, natural remedies and natural health.”  When approached by The Dr. Oz Show for an objective GCBE brand recommendation, Mr. Duncan allegedly promoted his own products without disclosing his affiliation with Pure Health and Genesis Today, as required by the FTC’s Product Endorsement and Testimonial Guidelines.

By failing to disclose their financial interest in the sale of Pure Health GCBE, the FTC argues that the defendants’ endorsements amounted to separate violations.  “This additional information would be material to consumers in deciding to purchase Defendants’ products,” the Commission noted.

Joint and Several Liability

The FTC alleged that Genesis Today and Pure Health, at the direction of Mr. Duncan, engaged in the purported deceptive acts and practices as a common enterprise. The defendants conducted business through interrelated companies that had common control, officers, business functions, employees and office locations.  As a result, the parent company (Genesis Today), its subsidiary (Pure Health) and its CEO will be held jointly and severally responsible for Monday’s $9 million judgment.

Be Careful

As evidenced by this settlement, the FTC continues its offensive against dietary supplement companies for claims made in connection with advertising and marketing campaigns.  It is critical that product providers and marketers remain abreast of ever-evolving regulations in the dietary supplement and marketing space, or risk bearing substantial (and perhaps even personal) liability.

If you are a health or dietary supplement provider, a marketer of such products, or if you have been served with legal process relating to your marketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog posts:

1)      https://kleinmoynihan.com/blog/federal-trade-commission-settles-false-advertising-claims-against-health-supplement-company/

2)      https://kleinmoynihan.com/blog/supplement-purveyors-sued-for-deceptive-weight-loss-claims-on-fake-news-sites/

3)      https://kleinmoynihan.com/blog/ftc-targets-deceptive-marketing-of-weight-loss-shapewear/

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin