OkCupid Hit with Deceptive Advertising Class Action Lawsuit

April 26, 2017

deceptive-advertisingLast week, a putative deceptive advertising class action lawsuit was filed against Dallas-based online dating company Match Group, Inc. (“Match”) in connection with certain premium paid features available on Match’s OkCupid platform.

What is the nature of the claims against Match?

OkCupid’s A-List Feature

Match’s OkCupid service offers users both free accounts and optional, paid features.  Those who sign up for OkCupid’s “A-List” service and pay $10, $15 or $20 per month (depending on the length of subscription) receive a variety of premium perks, including ad-free content, additional search filters and the ability to see a full list of everyone who has “liked” them.

Deceptive Advertising Lawsuit

In February, Illinois resident Chad Perkins paid to access OkCupid’s A-List service.  However, according to court records, his “likes” list included individuals whose OkCupid profiles had since been deleted.  When Perkins contacted a Match customer service agent, he was informed that the inclusion of deleted profiles “was a bug” and that Match is “working on a fix so this doesn’t happen going forward.”

On April 20, 2017, Perkins commenced the subject class action lawsuit against Match in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 17-cv-2988) on behalf of all OkCupid A-List users whose lists of “likes” included deleted user profiles.  The complaint alleges that Match violated Illinois State’s deceptive advertising statute by marketing “A-List memberships to Plaintiff and the Class under the false pretense that more OkCupid users ‘liked’ them than the number, if any, who actually had.”

Perkins’ complaint further claims that Match has operated OkCupid in violation of the Illinois Dating Referral Services Act, which requires dating referral services to have written contracts with their customers that contain certain statutory requirements and prohibitions.

Protect Yourself from a Deceptive Advertising Lawsuit

As the above-referenced case illustrates, companies that offer online paid premium services can routinely come under scrutiny from class action plaintiffs, as well as federal and state authorities.  Accordingly, it is critically important that such businesses work closely with knowledgeable marketing counsel to ensure that they steer clear of regulatory pitfalls.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, or if you have been served with legal process relating to your marketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Avoid Deceptive Internet Advertising Claims

Appeals Court Revives GameStop Deceptive Trade Practices Lawsuit

Carrot Neurotechnology Settles Deceptive Advertising Claims with FTC


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

FTSA TCPA Telemarketing telemarketer note pad lawsuit

FTSA Lawsuit Update

Readers of our blog may recall a recent piece in which we discussed a Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (“FTSA”) lawsuit pending in the United States

Read More »