New ADA Website Legislation Introduced

New ADA website legislation
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Updated February 10, 2021.

Each year, litigation related to the accessibility of websites for people with disabilities continues to increase. Most jurisdictions have determined that websites are places of public accommodation that are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Unfortunately, for some time, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), tasked with ADA regulation and enforcement, has refused to provide standards for ADA website compliance. In this regulatory vacuum, U.S. courts have taken the lead and often directed businesses to meet Website Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”) 2.0 Level AA success criteria for ADA website compliance. Against this backdrop, on October 2, 2020, Congressmen Ted Budd (R-NC) and Lou Correa (D-CA) introduced the Online Accessibility Act (the “Act”) in the House of Representatives in an attempt to create a technical standard for ADA website compliance. 

What are the key points of the Act?

Breaking Down the Act

The proposed legislation would require all consumer facing websites and mobile applications to be in substantial compliance with WCAG 2.0 Level A and Level AA standards. According to the Act, businesses that are not substantially compliant with these standards may provide alternative means that offer equivalent access to the desired content. Importantly, the proposed legislation would prevent individuals from bringing civil actions until all administrative remedies have been exhausted. If written into law, the administrative process: 1) would require that individuals notify website and mobile application owners that they are non-compliant; 2) would afford website and mobile application owners ninety (90) days to bring their subject websites or mobile applications into compliance; 3) would allow affected individuals to file complaints with the Department of Justice if the websites or mobile applications are not brought into compliance; 4)  contemplates that the United States Attorney General would then launch an investigation within 180 days to determine whether a violation exists; and 5) contemplates that if a violation does exist, the United States Attorney General would commence a civil action in any appropriate United States District Court. If the Attorney General is successful in its civil action, the court may grant equitable relief, monetary damages, and civil penalties not to exceed $20,000 for a first violation and $50,000 for any subsequent violation. 

ADA Website Compliance

Unfortunately, until the Act, or similar legislation, is passed, there will continue to be a flood of litigation. In this state of regulatory uncertainty, the best way to prevent a lawsuit is to ensure ADA website compliance of WCAG 2.0 Level AA success criteria. In addition, regular audits of company websites and documenting a history of compliance should help prevent/defend against frivolous lawsuits. 

If you require assistance with ADA website accessibility compliance for your business, please email us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney. 

Attorney Advertising

Photo by AbsolutVision on Unsplash

Related Blog Posts:

Website ADA Lawsuit Filed Against Golden State Warriors

Website Accessibility Lawsuit Calls Foul on the Miami Heat

1-800-Flowers.Com Sued in Website Accessibility Lawsuit

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin