Website Accessibility Lawsuits Abound

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

August 21, 2019 

website-accessibility-lawsuit
Website Accessibility Lawsuits

Website accessibility lawsuits (i.e., lawsuits alleging discrimination on the basis that websites contain access barriers that limit navigation for disabled people) increased 177% percent from 2017 to 2018 alone. These website accessibility lawsuits have been brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of a disability “in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods [and] services . . . of any place of public accommodation.” The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has recently affirmed its position that websites are places of public accommodation. On the litigation front, there is a split of opinion among federal courts as to whether a website alone (i.e., one not connected to a brick-and-mortar store) is a place of public accommodation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, regardless of where a company is located, all entities with an online presence should build/review their websites with an eye directed towards ADA compliance.

Why has the number of website accessibility lawsuits increased so exponentially? 

The ADA

The explosion of website accessibility lawsuits in recent years can be largely attributed to: (1) the fact that the ADA was enacted in 1990, at a time when “access barriers” were understood to mean physical barriers to access and not “access barriers” to website content; and (2) the lack of published guidance from the DOJ.

In the offline/physical space, the ADA and DOJ provide very specific standards requiring physical commercial locations to accommodate disabled individuals beyond simply “equal access.” However, because the DOJ continues to abstain from providing specific compliance guidance for websites, courts are left to interpret what “equal access” means in the context of website accessibility lawsuits.

Website accessibility lawsuits are typically brought on the basis of unequal access, such as where a screen reader cannot read text on a website. In the most extreme of cases, any minor website coding error may be a violation of the ADA. For example, if a website has an image that the alt-text (which is the HTML coding describing the image) describes as a cat, but the image is actually that of a dog—this may violate the ADA, it is argued,  because this results in unequal access (the sighted person can see the dog, but the blind person only hears “cat”).

Avoiding Website Accessibility Lawsuits

While we have seen lawsuits based on minor coding and/or alt-text errors (i.e., image of “dog,” but coded “cat”), the majority of cases contain a bit more substance (i.e., those that involve the checkout feature, problems with the shopping cart, and overall navigation issues). While the only sure-fire way to avoid a website accessibility lawsuit is to have a fully-compliant website that conforms to the current version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”)—a set of accessibility standards created by the World Wide Web Consortium (“WC3”), at a minimum all websites should:

  • include a skip to content feature at the top of each page;
  • provide a 24/7 toll-free telephone number (that can be read by screen readers) serviced by a live customer service representative who can provide access to all website information and functions; and
  • enable screen readers to read the most important text relevant to the featured products/services and allow users to buy (or subscribe to) those products/services.

Going Forward 

In our experience of defending website accessibility lawsuits, few of our clients were aware that their websites were inaccessible to the disabled. Unfortunately, because the ADA is a strict liability standard, ignorance of the law is not a recognized defense.

Companies facing website accessibility lawsuits often have to deal with negative press and unnecessary legal fees. Given the substantial risk, it is imperative for companies to have experienced website auditors and lawyers review their websites for compliance.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or have been served with legal process in connection with issues involving website accessibility, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney. 

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts: 

Website Accessibility and the ADA? The DOJ Won’t Weigh In.

Five Guys Grilled over ADA Website Accessibility

Have You Been Threatened with an ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit?

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

Creating a Viral and Legally Compliant "Pin to Win" Contest- Klein Moynihan Turco

Creating a Viral (And Legally Compliant) “Pin to Win” Contest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We have frequently written about the marketing benefits associated with the use of promotional contests and sweepstakes.  Promotional contests and sweepstakes often appear on social media platforms, which provide companies with a free and effective means to increase the number of consumers participating in their respective contests. While companies must

Facebook Decision defines a TCPA Autodialer- Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Facebook Aftermath: Courts Clarify Definition of TCPA Autodialer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On April 1st, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, marking a newly clarified definition of “autodialer” within the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). In the two weeks that followed, two federal courts have directly addressed the definition of TCPA autodialer as

Critical Role that TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing- KMT

The Critical Role that the TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you’re running any sort of outbound telemarketing campaign – phone calls, voicemail drops, or text messaging – you need to understand the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and its enabling regulations. Call center operators are not the only businesses that employ outbound telemarketing to reach out to consumers. Using

How to Use Promotional Marketing the Legal Way: Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

How To Use Promotional Marketing The Legal Way

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The use of promotional contests, games and sweepstakes marketing can be a dynamic and cost-effective way to increase sales, build a database of interested consumers and otherwise increase brand awareness and buzz. Consumers are more easily attracted to your marketing message by the opportunity to win prizes than with more

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin