Marketer to Pay $58K to FTC for Allegedly Deceptive Mobile Apps

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

August 17, 2015

mobile-appsLast Thursday, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC” or “Commission”) announced that it had settled its lawsuit against Mr. Avrom Lasarow in connection with a number of allegedly deceptive mobile apps. Mr. Lasarow’s “Mole Detective” apps purported to detect the skin cancer melanoma in moles on users’ skin.

What can app providers learn from this regulatory ordeal?

Allegedly Deceptive Mobile Apps and FTC Lawsuit

Purchasers of the Mole Detective apps were instructed to use the cameras on their mobile devices for purposes of melanoma risk assessment. According to the FTC’s complaint, the allegedly deceptive mobile apps used a mathematical algorithm to measure specific mole characteristics from the captured digital images, such as asymmetry, border, color, diameter and evolution.

Mr. Lasarow allegedly advertised the Mole Detective apps through print, social media and other Internet marketing channels, claiming that the Mole Detective apps could detect melanoma early and, therefore, increase consumers’ chances of survival. The Mole Detective apps were sold on Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store for $4.99 each. In 2012 and 2013 alone, U.S. sales exceeded $50,000.

In February of this year, the Commission filed suit against Mr. Lasarow – as well as his company and third-party marketers – in federal district court in Chicago. The complaint alleged that the defendants’ claims of mole analysis and skin cancer detection were false, misleading and unsubstantiated, in violation of the FTC’s deceptive marketing regulations.

App Provider Settles FTC Lawsuit

On August 13, 2015, the Commission announced that Mr. Lasarow had agreed to settle the FTC lawsuit. Under the terms of the settlement, he is now forbidden from making any misleading or unsubstantiated claims about the health benefits or efficacy of any product or service, through mobile apps or otherwise.

Additionally, Mr. Lasarow has agreed to pay $58,623.42 to the Commission to redress consumer injuries if certain financial statements, declarations and other documents that he submitted to the FTC are found to be untrue, inaccurate or incomplete.

Mobile Marketers: Apps Must Comply with Federal Regulations

As evidenced by this lawsuit, the FTC continues to take legal action against mobile marketers for claims made in connection with their product/service advertising. As apps and other mobile-based marketing strategies continue to grow in popularity, so does federal regulation of such channels.

If you are an app provider, a marketer of such software, or if you have been served with legal process relating to your marketing practices, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar Blog Posts:

FTC Sues Amazon For Alleged In-App Purchasing Scheme Targeting Children

FTC Issues Report and Guidelines for Mobile Shopping App Developers and Consumers

New Mobile App Guidance Released for the Collection, Use and Sharing of Consumer Information

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin