FCC Asked to Clarify Scope of TCPA Opt-Out Requests

TCPA opt-out
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is in the process of evaluating whether to issue a declaratory ruling which would provide clarification on if and how companies are permitted to respond to consumer TCPA opt-out requests.  Such guidance offers the promise of providing much needed certainty to businesses trying to more efficiently manage relationships with their customers.   

What is being asked of the FCC with respect to the TCPA Opt-Out issue?

The FCC was asked to examine the scope of consumer TCPA opt-out requests by Capital One Services, LLC (“Capital One”).  Capital One submitted a petition to the FCC seeking confirmation that the TCPA permits text message senders to clarify the scope of consumer opt-out requests through one-time follow-up confirmation text messages.  Capital One was concerned that consumers who respond “Stop” to text messages informing them about a declined card transaction (for example) could be deprived of important information concerning their accounts or relationship with the bank if Capital One were forced to interpret “Stop” responses as a complete revocation of consent, rather than a revocation of consent as to a particular category of message.   

Capital One’s petition has subsequently been supported by a variety of industry groups representing businesses that rely on making calls and sending text messages to keep their customers informed on a variety of aspects of their respective relationships.  Most, if not all, interested parties have expressed concerns presented by “Stop” responses received from consumers.  Specifically, the conundrum breaks down as follows: either businesses deprive consumers of information that they might use to make informed decisions about the business’ products or services by interpreting such responses as the wholesale revocation of TCPA consent, or businesses risk exposure to TCPA liability through continued messaging to consumers by interpreting “Stop” messages as more narrowly applying to the category of message to which they were directed.  

Readers of this blog will recall that the FCC has spent the better part of the last three years engaging in a broad effort to reexamine various aspects of the TCPA following the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in ACA International.   On the TCPA out-out issue in particular, industry groups are hopeful that the FCC will act quickly to provide sought-after clarification.  The FCC may ultimately oblige by taking a narrower approach to guidance on the TCPA rather than issuing an omnibus declaratory ruling on the scale of the erstwhile 2015 Order.  However, it turns out, interested members of the industry are advised to keep a watchful eye out for potentially imminent and useful FCC action.

Protecting Against Liability After a TCPA Opt-Out

Marketers require certainty when it comes to complying with applicable telemarketing laws, rules and regulations governing their advertising campaigns.  Guidance from the FCC, through an anticipated declaratory ruling, on how it interprets the scope of the TCPA’s consent provisions will be especially helpful to the compliance practices of those operating in the telemarketing space.  In the current regulatory climate, the cost of misinterpreting a consumer’s “Stop” response to a text message can be financially devastating.  Consequently, until such time as the FCC does issue such guidance, it is imperative that marketers work closely with experienced telemarketing attorneys to review all practices and procedures prior to launching any campaign. 

If you need to review your telemarketing practices and procedures, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

Similar blog posts: 

The Telemarketer’s Guide to TCPA Consent

FCC Seeks Comment on New Autodialer Definition

FCC Clarifies Scope of TCPA Fax Liability

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin