Alleged Mortgage Modification and Debt Relief Scammers to Pay FTC $13.5 Million

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

September 6, 2016

debt-reliefLast week, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida had granted a summary judgment motion against various businesses, law firms and individuals for FTC Act and the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule violations.  In awarding the FTC summary judgment, the Court permanently enjoined the defendants from selling secured and unsecured debt relief products and services, and from misrepresenting any financial products or services, in the future.  In addition, the defendants must pay a judgment of more than $13.5 million, which represents the defendants’ net revenues associated with the venture.

Why did the Court Award Summary Judgment against the Mortgage Modification Business?

FTC Awarded Summary Judgment against Mortgage Modification and Debt Relief Service Business

According to the allegations of the FTC, the defendants falsely promised financially-distressed consumers that the defendants’ services would prevent home foreclosure and that the defendants would work to lower consumers’ mortgage payments and interest rates.  Moreover, the defendants promised consumers an 85%-100% chance of receiving a mortgage modification and, based on such promises, collected upwards of $4,000 in advance and then $300 or more per month from each consumer that enrolled in the program.  In the end, of course, the defendants could not live up to their promises.  The Court found that defendants had made numerous misrepresentations to consumers, and that the “law firms” involved were sham businesses.

Protect Yourself

It is important that businesses refrain from making statements and promises in advertising that can be construed by the FTC and other regulators as misleading.  We recently blogged about the FTC’s nationwide crackdown on deceptive marketing campaigns.  In this regulatory climate, businesses must consult with experienced counsel to prevent substantial marketing-related legal exposure.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Telemarketing Law practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your telemarketing or marketing practices in general, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

FTC Announces Dog Food False Advertising Settlement

Warner Bros. Settles FTC Claims of Paid YouTuber Endorsements

Health Insurance Marketer Settles FTC Deceptive Marketing Practices Lawsuit

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

Creating a Viral and Legally Compliant "Pin to Win" Contest- Klein Moynihan Turco

Creating a Viral (And Legally Compliant) “Pin to Win” Contest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We have frequently written about the marketing benefits associated with the use of promotional contests and sweepstakes.  Promotional contests and sweepstakes often appear on social media platforms, which provide companies with a free and effective means to increase the number of consumers participating in their respective contests. While companies must

Facebook Decision defines a TCPA Autodialer- Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Facebook Aftermath: Courts Clarify Definition of TCPA Autodialer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On April 1st, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, marking a newly clarified definition of “autodialer” within the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). In the two weeks that followed, two federal courts have directly addressed the definition of TCPA autodialer as

Critical Role that TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing- KMT

The Critical Role that the TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you’re running any sort of outbound telemarketing campaign – phone calls, voicemail drops, or text messaging – you need to understand the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and its enabling regulations. Call center operators are not the only businesses that employ outbound telemarketing to reach out to consumers. Using

How to Use Promotional Marketing the Legal Way: Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

How To Use Promotional Marketing The Legal Way

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The use of promotional contests, games and sweepstakes marketing can be a dynamic and cost-effective way to increase sales, build a database of interested consumers and otherwise increase brand awareness and buzz. Consumers are more easily attracted to your marketing message by the opportunity to win prizes than with more

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin