Health Insurance Marketer Settles FTC Deceptive Marketing Practices Lawsuit

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

July 22, 2016

deceptive-marketingThe Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently prevailed in a deceptive marketing practices investigation involving Partners In Health Care Association (“PIHC”) and its owner.  The judgment obtained by the FTC provides for, among other things, a monetary penalty of nearly $9 million and a prohibition against PIHC and its owner from selling healthcare products, as well as any future telemarketing of any good or service.

What was the nature of PIHC’s alleged deceptive marketing campaign?

The FTC had accused PIHC of running a marketing campaign in which it sold medical discount cards to consumers under the false pretense that PIHC was actually selling health insurance.  PIHC was alleged to have targeted the most vulnerable consumers in need of health insurance through telemarketing, Spanish-language radio advertisements, television advertisements and Internet ads.  PIHC was also accused of falsely claiming that its health insurance plans provided comprehensive insurance at a low cost, luring consumers into paying an upfront enrollment fee and a monthly payment which could cost up to several hundred dollars.  It was only upon receipt of the written materials describing the purchased product (which was often received after the time to receive a refund had lapsed) that most consumers realized that PIHC had not actually sold them health insurance.

Best Practices to Avoid a Deceptive Marketing Practices Lawsuit

As we have previously blogged, federal authorities and state attorneys general alike have been active in investigating and prosecuting companies for deceptive advertising and marketing practices.   Though the foregoing example may involve more sinister motives than those of the typical marketer, the vigorous efforts of the FTC nevertheless serve to reinforce the reality that it is necessary to provide accurate representations in the marketing of any good or service.  Advertisers face a wide range of legal risks in today’s regulatory climate.  Therefore, before undertaking a marketing campaign, it is imperative to engage knowledgeable counsel to ensure that your marketing practices and procedures are fully compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, need to review your marketing practices and procedures or if you are facing an investigation from a state attorney general or other regulatory agency, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

FTC Settles Deceptive Business Practices Lawsuit

Retailer Settles FTC Deceptive Advertising Claims for Product Endorsements on Instagram

Subway Settles Sandwich Length Deceptive Trade Practices Lawsuit

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin