WordSmart Educational Services Settles FTC Deceptive Advertising Lawsuit for $18+ Million

Share This Post

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on google
Share on email

October 13, 2014

deceptive advertisingOn October 9, 2014, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced that WordSmart Corporation (“WordSmart”), the popular retailer of children’s educational products, agreed to an $18 million+ settlement for allegedly engaging in deceptive advertising in violation of the FTC Act.  Specifically, the FTC alleged that WordSmart misrepresented the benefits of its products to parents of school-age children by claiming that using its products for 20 hours would drastically improve their children’s academic performance.  According to the FTC, WordSmart’s claims were unsubstantiated by clinical studies.

WordSmart Services and Deceptive Advertising Claims

WordSmart is a prominent provider of educational products to school age children.  Its products range from test taking study materials for the SAT, ACT and GRE, to subject specific educational courses for science, English, math, etc.  WordSmart has expended significant capital in marketing its products to parents and guardians, even going so far as to produce an infomercial game show hosted by Jeopardy’s Alex Trebek.  WordSmart’s programs are priced between $15 and $300.

WordSmart ran into trouble when it touted that use of its products would raise children’s academic performance by a full letter grade, or GPA point, with a mere 20 hours of use.  Similarly, WordSmart asserted that its test-taking programs could raise a child’s SAT score by at least 200 points.  However, none of these assertions were supported by necessary clinical studies or scientific evidence.

WordSmart was also accused of violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”) by repeatedly calling consumer telephone numbers that were listed on the national Do-Not-Call list, refusing to comply with consumer do-not-call requests and failing to connect consumers to representatives within two-seconds after the consumer answered the phone, in violation of the abandoned call rule.  As we have previously detailed, the TSR carries a penalty of $11,000 per violation.

As part of its settlement with the FTC, WordSmart has agreed to discontinue any further deceptive advertising and to pay $147,400 in penalties.  The entire $18.7 million judgment will become immediately due and owing if it is discovered that WordSmart misrepresented its financial condition or again violates the FTC Act or TSR.

Protect Yourself

The FTC has been aggressively targeting companies that engage in deceptive advertising.  Resulting settlements underscore the fact that marketers which tout the benefits of their products must ensure that any and all advertising claims are supported by credible and reliable clinical studies.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, or if you have been served with legal process relating to deceptive advertising, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call

In the Telemarketing or Internet Marketing Industries?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced Lawyer.

Are You Running a Promotion or Advertisement?

Get a free compliance review of your telemarketing or Internet marketing operation.