will.i.am’s #Willpower Trademark Application Rejected

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

August 27, 2018

trademark-application
Trademark Application

will.i.am’s trademark application for #Willpower has received a final refusal by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). The TTAB found that #Willpower was likely to be confused with a previously registered mark which consisted of two offset, identical mountain peaks with the stylized text “WILLPOWER WEAR” below and “Have the will. . .” to the right of the mountain peaks (“Registered Mark”).

What was the reasoning behind the TTAB’s refusal?

Trademark Application Refusal

One of the most common reasons that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) will refuse a trademark application is that the applied for mark is likely to cause consumer confusion with previously registered marks. The two key factors in the likelihood of confusion analysis are the similarities of the respective marks and the relatedness of their associated goods or services. In the case at hand, will.i.am was looking to register #Willpower for his clothing line in the same class as that of the Registered Mark. Additionally, the TTAB found that the marks were similar because the shared word WILLPOWER was dominant enough to create a similar appearance, connotation and overall commercial impression between the two marks.

Adding Hashtags to Your Mark 

To a layperson, #Willpower and the Registered Mark do not look similar. However, the USPTO is not charged with preventing registration of only similar looking marks. The USPTO endeavors to protect consumers from confusion involving marks that are similar in their entirety of appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. Additionally, when the goods or services associated with two given marks are identical, as in the case at hand, less similarity is needed to suggest confusion. In recent years, hashtags have become a popular mechanism for brands to gain notoriety. The USPTO is aware of this and has concluded that hashtags generally serve no source-indicating function. As such, in the instant matter, the TTAB found that the overall appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression of #Willpower is simply “Willpower.”

Preventing Prolonged Trademark Application Review

will.i.am initially applied for a trademark in April of 2013. It took over five years from the date of filing the initial trademark application for a final decision to be rendered. Additionally, will.i.am had a separate seven-year battle with the USPTO over an application for “I AM.” Most people do not have the time and resources to wait five to seven years for a final ruling on their trademark applications. Accordingly, to avoid possible delays in registering a mark it is always wise to consult with a trademark attorney who can advise you on the ins and outs associated with the registration process. If you are interested in learning more about this topic, or if you have received a trademark office action, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

A Slice of Trademark Law for Kendall Jenner’s Pizza Boys

Craft Breweries Settle Beer Trademark Dispute

Trademark Law Hits the Gridiron

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin