Vermont Vapor Up in Smoke for Allegedly Deceptive E-Cig Marketing Practices

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

February 16, 2017

e-cig-marketingLast week, Vermont Vapor, Inc. (“Vermont Vapor”) announced that the Vermont Attorney General’s Office is seeking $50,000 in penalties in connection with Vermont Vapor’s e-cig marketing practices.

How can e-cig manufacturers and related marketing affiliates avoid problems with regulators?

Attorney General Investigation of E-Cig Marketing Practices

In December 2016, the Vermont Attorney General’s Office delivered a civil investigative demand (CID) to Vermont Vapor, which included substantial document requests and a number of questions related to Vermont Vapor’s e-cig marketing practices.

On January 31, 2017, in response to the AG’s investigation and increased regulation of the e-cigarette industry, Vermont Vapor announced that it will be closing its business and that the company’s owner plans to move out of the State.  The very next day, the Vermont Attorney General’s Office delivered a proposed settlement agreement to Vermont Vapor that, among other things, would require the e-cig manufacturer to:

  • Pay $50,000 in civil penalties to the State of Vermont;
  • Admit to various alleged violations of the Vermont Consumer Protection Act;
  • Cease and desist from:
    • Making unsubstantiated testimonials and smoking cessation, health and safety claims;
    • Providing free e-liquid samples; and
    • Featuring certain “vaping Santa Claus,” “vaping Easter Bunny” and “vaping skeleton” yard inflatables at its retail location.
  • Agree to liquidated damages of $10,000 for each future violation of the settlement agreement.

Vermont Vapor has denied all wrongdoing and reiterated that it has chosen to close down rather than entertain the AG’s investigation and settlement proposal.

In an unusual twist, Vermont Vapor appears to have been involved in a separate trademark dispute in 2015 with an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Delaware after she started a competing online e-cigarette business (in her personal capacity) named “Vermont Vapors.”   The Vermont Vapors website and social media pages have since been removed.

E-Cig Marketing Compliance: Don’t Blow It Off

As the above-referenced case illustrates, lawmakers and regulators across the country are cracking down on e-cig marketing.  In this rapidly developing regulatory landscape, e-cigarette manufacturers, retailers and related marketing affiliates are at risk of regulatory action and other adverse legal consequences, which can prove fatal for a business.  As such, businesses and individuals operating in the e-cigarette space should be sure to speak with an experienced marketing attorney before commencing any e-cigarette marketing campaign.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, need to review your e-cigarette marketing practices, or are being investigated by an attorney general or other regulatory agency, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Navigating the Maze of E-Cig Marketing Regulations

Summary of the Newly Proposed E-Cig Regulations

New York Set to Hear New E-Cig Regulations Today

 

 

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin