Toyota/Sirius Sued for Violations of the TCPA

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

January 16, 2015

tcpaOn January 8, 2015, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging that Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (“Sirius”) had placed numerous unsolicited telemarketing calls to the plaintiff’s cellular telephone using an automatic telephone dialing system in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”).  Additionally, the lawsuit seeks to hold Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. (“Toyota”) vicariously liable for Sirius’s TCPA violations.  The lawsuit seeks $1500 in statutory damages per call per class member, as well as treble damages.  Neither Sirius, nor Toyota, have responded to requests for comment.

Alleged Violations of the TCPA by Sirius

According to the complaint, in September 2014, the plaintiff purchased an automobile “from Toyota’s San Antonio dealership.”  The named plaintiff alleges that he was unaware that his new automobile included a free-trial for Sirius satellite radio.  Thereafter, between September and December of that year, Sirius placed more than 30 telemarketing calls to the plaintiff’s cellular telephone, attempting to sell him a Sirius satellite radio subscription.  The plaintiff alleges that all of these telemarketing calls were made in violation of the TCPA.

Alleged Violations of the TCPA by Toyota

According to the complaint, the plaintiff answered at least one telemarketing call from Sirius.  During that call, the plaintiff asked how Sirius had obtained his telephone number.  The telemarketer informed the plaintiff that Sirius obtained his number “from his recent car purchase from a Toyota dealership and that his call was for the purpose of inquiring whether Plaintiff would like to purchase ongoing Sirius radio service.”  In October of 2014, the plaintiff received confirmation from the Toyota dealership where he had purchased his automobile that the Toyota corporate office in California had in fact provided his telephone number to Sirius.  However, according to the complaint, “Toyota did not make any disclosure concerning its sale or exchange of customer information to third-parties such as Sirius.”  The plaintiff alleges that neither Toyota, nor Sirius, ever obtained his prior express written consent to receive such calls as is required under the TCPA.

Protect Yourself

We recently blogged about AT&T’s $45 million settlement of a lawsuit involving telemarketing calls allegedly placed to cellular telephones in violation of the TCPA.  The TCPA is a strict liability statute, and class action lawsuits concerning violations of the law have increased over the past few years.  It is important that marketers and service providers alike understand the parameters of both federal and state telemarketing laws to avoid becoming the subject of class-action litigation.

If you are interested in this topic or if you have been served with legal process relating to your telemarketing practices, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

You may be interested in similar blog posts related to this topic:

How to Defend and Win a TCPA Lawsuit

All Parties in the Marketing Chain May Be Held Liable for TCPA Violations

Connecticut’s New TCPA-Like Telemarketing Law Mandates Enhanced Damages and is Now in Effect

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin