The X’s and O’s of Fantasy Football

September 3, 2015

fantasy-footballWith football season rapidly approaching, and the ever expanding popularity of fantasy sports spurring excitement among fantasy football participants and fantasy football operators alike, it is important to highlight some of the critical requirements needed to ensure that paid contests are legal.

The rules pertaining to fantasy sports contests that require an entry fee, and that pay out cash prizes, vary by jurisdiction, and the legality of such fantasy sports contests is often determined by various features of the contests themselves.

In terms of federal law, the 2006 Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“UIGEA”) created a specific carve out for fantasy sports games that meet certain criteria. However, while some state laws, including one recently passed in Kansas, are consistent with the UIGEA carve-out, other states do not permit fantasy sports contests the free rein they would otherwise enjoy under UIGEA.

Basic rules that must be adhered to include the following:

  • First, for a fantasy football contest to be legal, the outcome of the contest must be determined by the statistics generated by multiple athletes (not all on the same team) participating in multiple real-world sporting events. So, at the very least, fantasy football contests should require players to assemble a roster consisting of several athletes, from more than one team and participating in more than one game.
  • Second, the prizes offered to the winners must not be influenced by the amount of fees paid by the contestants, or the number of contestants in a given fantasy football contest. While it might be tempting as an operator of a pay-for-play fantasy football contest to treat the purse for each contest like a pot at a poker table – the more players that enter a game and pay a fee, the greater the pot grows – such a scenario would be in violation of applicable law. Instead, fantasy football contest operators must pick a prize amount prior to the commencement of the particular contest, and not modify that amount based on the number of players participating in the fantasy contest, or amount paid in entry fees.

Fantasy Football: A Changing Landscape

In many states, the legality of fantasy football games that are played for money remains unclear and in a state of flux. The evolution of interpretations of fantasy sports gaming remains a significant topic for all gaming attorneys, fantasy sports lawyers and those interested in fantasy sports law in general.

This blog post only touches on a few of the relevant legal issues involved in the fantasy football arena. If you plan on engaging in, or operating, a fantasy sports venture, you should retain competent legal counsel to help you design the contests in a way that comports with applicable law.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or pursuing a venture in this area, please e-mail us at, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Fantasy Sports Pool Betting May Soon Be Legal in Nevada

Update on Fantasy Sports Legalization Across the USA

Multiple U.S. States Push to Join Fantasy Sports Upsurge




David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

TCPA vicarious tcpa law woman holding cellphone telemarketing laws

TCPA Vicarious Liability

An Illinois federal district court judge recently held that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) may be vicariously liable for alleged Telephone Consumer

Read More »