tcpa texas texas capitol building with american flag and texas flag on flag pole in front

Texas Mini-TCPA Update

Readers may recall a recent piece in which we discussed a constitutional challenge to the implementation of Texas Senate Bill 140 (“SB 140”), which overhauled Texas’ mini-Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). Below, we discuss in detail the resolution of this challenge and provide an update for companies that engage in consent-based telemarketing in Texas.

Texas Mini-TCPA Registration Requirements

When we wrote about SB 140’s sweeping amendments to Texas’ mini-TCPA, it was unsettled as to whether its burdensome registration and disclosure requirements applied to companies that engage in consent-based telemarketing. This issue was created as a result of SB 140’s amendment to the definition of “telephone call” in Texas’ mini-TCPA registration section. While a different section of Texas’ mini-TCPA defines “telephone call” to explicitly exclude transmissions to consumers who have agreed to receive them, the definition of “telephone call” in Texas’ mini-TCPA registration requirement provision does not include this express exemption. In an effort to obtain clarity, Ecommerce Innovation Alliance (“EIA”), an e-commerce advocacy group, and two other companies opposed SB 140’s application to businesses that telemarket to consumers who provide prior, affirmative consent.

As part of a settlement, the Texas Office of Attorney General and its Secretary of State (“SOS”) issued guidance confirming that text messages sent with prior consumer consent are not “telephone calls” for purposes of Texas’ mini-TCPA registration provision. In other words, businesses that only send text messages to Texas consumers who provided prior, affirmative consent are not subject to Texas’ mini-TCPA registration requirements. The SOS also agreed to add the following language to its website: “any business that sends text messages with prior consent of the consumer is not required to complete the Telephone Solicitation Registration Statement under Business and Commerce Code Chapter 302.”

What Does This Mean For Your Company?

It should be noted that the above guidance applies equally to consent-based telemarketing calls. According to the terms of the settlement agreement, companies that already filed registration applications with the SOS may withdraw their applications if the SOS has not acted on their applications. Formal guidance on the withdrawal process is posted on the SOS website. Because SB 140 amended Texas’ mini-TCPA to consider violations as a deceptive trade practice, companies are subject to civil penalties of $5,000 per violation. As a result of these recent developments, businesses that only send consent-based text messages to Texas consumers do not violate Texas’ mini-TCPA by failing to comply with its registration requirements.

The attorneys at Klein Moynihan Turco (“KMT”) have extensive experience assisting companies with regulatory and marketing law compliance. If your company engages in telemarketing to consumers in Texas and needs help with understanding its telemarketing regulations, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice nor is it a substitute for seeking legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Photo by Pete Alexopoulos on Unsplash

Similar Blog Posts:

What Is A “Residential Subscriber” Under The TCPA?

TCPA Compliance is Essential! Give Your Practices and Procedures a Facelift

TCPA Quiet Hours Telemarketing and Consent

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
person on shopify website wiretapping claim

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »

Trending Topics

Trending Topics

person on shopify website wiretapping claim
Blog

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls
Blog

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »
phone on table with reflection opt out tcpa telemarketing
Blog

New Effective Date for TCPA Opt-Out Rule!

Although originally adopted on February 16, 2024, the Federal Communications Commission again has decided to delay the effective date of its opt-out regulation until January 31, 2027. We discuss the reasoning for the most recent delay below.   TCPA Opt-Out Regulation Delayed, Again 

Read More »