Supplement Marketer Settles FTC’s Negative Option-Related Lawsuit

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

September 23, 2016

negative-optionNutritional supplement marketer, NutraClick, has entered into a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), ending a lawsuit that the agency initiated for alleged violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act.   The FTC had brought the lawsuit in connection with allegations that NutraClick charged customers recurring monthly fees without their consent after consumers had ordered free sample products, an illegal negative option billing practice according to the FTC’s complaint.

What has NutraClick agreed to as part of the settlement?

In addition to a restitution payment of $350,000, NutraClick has agreed to the following prohibitions concerning its future billing and advertising practices:

  • Using consumer billing information to obtain payment without first obtaining the express authorization of the customer;
  • Obtaining consumer billing information without first disclosing to the customer that there will be a charge, or that a charge is set to increase after a certain time period; and
  • Failing to disclose to consumers that charges will continue on a recurring basis unless the customer cancels, the method to effectuate such cancelation, and the deadline by which the costumer must cancel the recurring charge.

Protect Yourself From Negative Option Billing-Related Scrutiny

When done correctly, recurring billing methods provide a convenience for both businesses and their consumers by doing away with the need to revisit the purchase/payment process each month for a product or service that the consumer plans to use for an extended period of time.  However, it is important that the consumer be made aware of the price prior to purchase, and that all details concerning the recurring charges are adequately communicated to the consumer.  The NutraClick case illustrates the reality that companies which engage in negative option automatic billing practices can routinely come under scrutiny from federal and state authorities.  Accordingly, it is critically important that businesses work closely with knowledgeable counsel to ensure that they provide clear and conspicuous disclosures to customers concerning subscriptions and/or renewals in connection with their product and service offerings.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your marketing and billing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Court Enjoins California Marketers from Continuing Negative Option Risk Free Trials

22 State AGs Settle Data Passing to Negative Option Marketer Claims for $11 Million

Putting the Positive in Negative Option Billing

 

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin