Sirius XM Radio to Pay $3.8 Million in Settlement of Multi-State Unfair Business Practices Investigation

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

December 12, 2014

unfair business practicesTo end an unfair business practices investigation being conducted by 45 separate state attorneys general, Sirius XM Radio (“Sirius”) will pay a whopping $3.8 million into a settlement pool to be divided among the states.  The attorneys general released various announcements of the deal, including that of the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey.  Consumers in the settling states have until May 2015 to file a complaint, although the subject Sirius conduct must have occurred between July 28, 2008 and December 4, 2014.

Sirius XM Radio’s Unfair Business Practices

The states alleged that Sirius employed deceptive and unfair business practices to take advantage of consumers, in violation of various state consumer protection laws.  The conduct Sirius is alleged to have engaged in includes automatic renewal of contracts without consent, unauthorized service fees, higher and unanticipated rates after low introductory rates, and failing to provide timely refunds.  In addition, the states allege that Sirius made it “nearly impossible” for consumers to cancel their contracts with the satellite radio subscription company.  In fact, according to the states, in many instances Sirius refused to honor their customers’ requests to cancel contracts and continued billing them for unwanted services.

Terms of Sirius’ Multi-State Settlement

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, Sirius entered into an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance.  Moving forward, Sirius must clearly and conspicuously disclose all material terms and conditions of service at the point of sale, such as billing frequency, term length, automatic renewal dates and cancellation policies.  With respect to automatic renewals, Sirius must now provide advance notice via regular mail or electronic mail about the upcoming automatic renewal if such renewed plan lasts longer than six months.  Additionally, Sirius must revise its cancellation policy to make it easier for its customers to cancel plans.  Moreover, Sirius can no longer provide incentive compensation for customer service representatives based solely on “saves,” or retaining current customers who attempt to cancel their service plans.

Protect Yourself

The importance of clear and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions of service is driven home by the terms of this settlement.  Although Sirius claims that the settlement “has no material effect on the company,” smaller companies may not be so lucky.  This blog has previously offered tips on what to do when you become the subject of a state attorney general investigation.  However, the best thing to do is avoid attorney general scrutiny in the first place by consulting with competent counsel about your companies’ policies, marketing practices and disclosures.

If you are interested in ensuring that you are compliant with current regulations or if you are facing an investigation from a state attorney general or other regulatory agency, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin