Seventh Circuit Dismisses Autodialer TCPA Case

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

December 24, 2015

autodialerThis week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissing a lawsuit alleging autodialer- related liability against AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. (“AllianceOne”). The suit was brought by Wayne Norman, an individual with whom this firm has encountered in similar Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) disputes.

On what grounds did the Appeals Court dismiss the autodialer claims?

Norman brought suit alleging that he had received seven calls from AllianceOne on his cellular telephone through use of an autodialer in violation of the TCPA.   To support this claim, Norman argued that he heard a “pause,” “clicking,” and “dead air” before he was connected to a live operator, and further pointed to a Federal Communications Commission guide which stated that use of autodialers often results in hang ups and dead air. The Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the autodialer claims, however, after favorably reviewing an affidavit from AllianceOne’s Vice President. His declaration described the relevant call log that demonstrated that all of the calls to Norman had been placed manually and that AllianceOne’s system to call cell phones actually lacks the capacity to make automated calls. The Court did not believe that Norman had any evidence to refute the AllianceOne business records.

Protect Your Business From Autodialer-Related Liability

We have written extensively about increased regulatory and judicial interest in autodialing, as well as telemarketing calls placed to cell phones in general. This case provides further proof of the importance of having proper practices and procedures in place concerning the use of autodialing technology. AllianceOne was ultimately able to avoid liability here by demonstrating that it was impossible for it to make use of an autodialer to impermissibly call Norman on his cell phone. In this regulatory environment, it is imperative to have telemarketing practices and procedures examined by experienced counsel prior to embarking on any telemarketing campaign in order to avoid potentially disastrous consequences in the event that a class action plaintiff or federal regulator brings suit for illegal use of autodialers.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your telemarketing practices and procedures, please e-mail us at, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Human Intervention the Focus in TCPA Autodialer Case

Does Yahoo Use an Autodialer in Violation of the TCPA?

Time Warner Hit with $230K Autodialer Judgment

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin