Roofing Company Held Liable for Unsolicited Fax Ads under the TCPA

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

May 13, 2015

tcpaThe United States District Court for the District of New Jersey recently held a roofing company liable for a third-party advertiser’s violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) to the tune of $22,405,000.00. The TCPA class action, which has been pending for over three years, concerns fax advertisements sent by Business to Business Solutions (“B2B”) on behalf of David/Randall Associates, Inc. (“DRA”). The Court held DRA vicariously liable for B2B’s violations of the TCPA despite the fact that DRA “never possessed a list of the intended fax recipients, nor requested such list from B2B.” Although the Court has entered judgment against DRA, claims concerning the personal liability of DRA’s principal are still pending.

Can I be liable under the TCPA even if I don’t send any faxes?

Vicarious Liability for Unsolicited Fax Advertisements under the TCPA

Even though DRA did not send any of the fax advertisements at issue in the class action, the Court nevertheless imposed judgment against DRA in the amount of $22,405,000.00. The Court reached this decision because “the disputed facsimiles solely concern [DRA’s] roofing services, and nowhere advertise the goods, services, or products of any other individual or entity.” The Court relied on an amicus letter filed by the Federal Communications Commission in another matter which stated that a defendant can be held liable under the TCPA even if “a defendant [transmitted] no facsimile to the plaintiff, but whose independent contractor did . . . .”

The Court also rejected the DRA’s prior business relationship defense. The Court noted that under the TCPA, this defense exists only where a defendant “possessed both an established business relationship with [DRA] and a sufficiently publicized facsimile number.” The Court went on to reject application of the defense in this instance due to evidentiary deficiencies.

Protect Yourself

We have previously blogged about the Ninth Circuit’s standard for finding vicarious liability under the TCPA. In this case, DRA has found itself vicariously liable for the TCPA violations of its marketing agent. In light of this and similar rulings, it is important that companies remain vigilant in overseeing the policies of their third-party advertisers.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or if you have been served with process concerning the TCPA or your telemarketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Treble Damages Not Automatic in TCPA Litigation

Tommy Hilfiger TCPA Class Action Lawsuit Focuses on Prior Express Written Consent

Blimpie Blown Up by TCPA Junk Fax Class Action

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin