Reeses sweepstakes law

Reese’s Potential Sweepstakes Law Violation

As Halloween approaches, so does the kick-off to the official holiday season. During this time of celebration, companies double-down with exciting sales, promotions and sweepstakes. One such business is Reese’s, owned by The Hershey Company. Unfortunately, Reese’s may find itself on the receiving end of regulatory action and/or a consumer lawsuit, as it appears that the current promotion may violate various state sweepstakes laws. 

The sweepstakes promotion at issue is featured on the outside of a Reese’s peanut butter cup wrapper, which reads “YOU COULD WIN $25,000.” In smaller print below, it says “SEE DETAILS INSIDE.” In order to access the subject sweepstakes details, the consumer must purchase and open the product, only to find that the small print sweepstakes disclosure includes the language “NO PURCHASE NECESSARY.” The product is currently being sold across the country in numerous retail locations. 

Does the Reese’s Promotion Violate Applicable Sweepstakes Laws?

As readers of this blog know, the main difference between an illegal lottery and a compliant sweepstakes promotion is that consumers must not be required to pay to enter a sweepstakes promotion. While purchasing a product or service to enter is allowed, applicable laws require a free alternative means of entry (“AMOE”). 

Many state deceptive advertising/unfair trade practice laws dictate that sweepstakes advertising cannot be misleading. Among other regulations, advertisements and packaging related to sweepstakes generally have to disclose the fact that NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY to enter. 

While the Official Rules for the Reese’s sweepstakes do provide that no purchase is necessary to enter and disclose the fact that an AMOE by mail-in is available to obtain a game code. The main issue with the Reese’s promotion from a sweepstakes law perspective is that the very existence of the AMOE does not appear to have been made available to consumers without their having made a purchase and reading about it inside the peanut butter cup wrapper. 

While state laws vary, some key components of a compliant sweepstakes promotional disclosure include:

  1. Language explaining that no purchase is necessary to enter;
  2. Language that purchase will not increase the odds of winning;
  3. The promotion start and end dates;
  4. The odds of winning a prize;
  5. The number and type(s) of prize(s) that will be awarded; and
  6. Eligibility requirements (such as minimum age and jurisdictions of residence).

Importance of Complying with Sweepstakes Laws

Another issue that Reese’s faces is that it appears that Reese’s ran the exact same promotion earlier this year, with the exact same packaging. To make matters worse, those peanut butter cups are still being sold to consumers even though the prior promotion is long over. 

As the confection is presently being sold across the country, Reese’s may find itself on the receiving end of lawsuits and potential regulatory action.  

Did they fail to post the Official Sweepstakes Rules at the retail locations? Did Reese’s consult with experienced sweepstakes law counsel prior to launching their promotion? 

Having counsel at your side will ensure that your sweepstakes complies with applicable state and federal laws – failure to do so could result in expensive and time-consuming legal and regulatory action.  

If you are interested in learning more about sweepstakes law or require assistance with your sweepstakes promotional games, please email us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney. 

Attorney Advertising

Photo by Terrance Barksdale on Pexels.

Sweepstakes Law: A Primer on How to Run Compliant Promotions 

The Importance of a Valid Sweepstakes AMOE 

Why Sweepstakes Contest Rules Matter

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
person on shopify website wiretapping claim

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »

Trending Topics

Trending Topics

person on shopify website wiretapping claim
Blog

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls
Blog

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »
phone on table with reflection opt out tcpa telemarketing
Blog

New Effective Date for TCPA Opt-Out Rule!

Although originally adopted on February 16, 2024, the Federal Communications Commission again has decided to delay the effective date of its opt-out regulation until January 31, 2027. We discuss the reasoning for the most recent delay below.   TCPA Opt-Out Regulation Delayed, Again 

Read More »