Record Do-Not-Call Settlement

1231361_87655482In a record Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) Do-Not-Call violation settlement announced on May 19, 2014, Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) agreed to pay $7.5 Million to resolve an FCC investigation into its wireless division’s failure to honor consumer requests to opt-out of the receipt of future telephone and text message marketing.  This settlement follows an earlier 2011 settlement stemming from numerous consumer complaints alleging that Sprint had continued to place telemarketing calls to consumers who had requested to be placed on the company’s internal do-not-call list.

Do-Not-Call Rules    

According to the federal Do-Not-Call rules, telemarketers are prohibited from calling consumers whose numbers appear on the National Do Not Call Registry.  There are exceptions for existing business relationships that allow companies to call consumers who have:  1) made a purchase within the previous 18 months; or 2) made inquiries with, or submitted an application to, the applicable company in the previous three months.

Pursuant to these exceptions, companies such as Sprint are permitted to contact their customers provided that they otherwise comply with the Amended Telemarketing Sales Rule (“ATSR”) and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), as well as honor consumers’ do-not-call requests.

In the facts at issue, Sprint has violated the Do-Not-Call rule, the ATSR and the TCPA by continuing to call and/or text message its customers after receiving their do-not-call/do-not-text requests.

FCC Enforcement Bureau Acting Chief Speaks

In announcing the Sprint settlement, Travis LeBlanc, Acting Chief of the Enforcement Bureau, stated, “[w]e expect companies to respect the privacy of consumers who have opted out of marketing calls.”  Mr. LeBlanc added, “[w]hen a consumer tells a company to stop calling or texting with promotional pitches, that request must be honored.  Today’s settlement leaves no question that protecting consumer privacy is a top enforcement priority.”

Specifics of the $7.5 Million Do-Not-Call Settlement Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, Sprint has agreed to, among other things:  1) make payment of $7.5 Million to the U.S. Treasury; and 2) implement a two-year plan to ensure telemarketing compliance in order to protect consumer privacy and to prevent consumers from receiving unwanted telemarketing calls in the future.

As repeatedly discussed on this blog, telemarketers must ensure that they comply with both state and federal telemarketing rules and regulations or risk significant penalties.  It is best to have all internal telemarketing practices and procedures regularly audited by experienced marketing counsel.

If your company is the subject of a telemarketing lawsuit or you require assistance in complying with telemarketing laws, please email us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at 212-246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertisement

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
guy on this cell phone tcpa michigan

Michigan Mini-TCPA Update

Readers may recall a piece late last year in which we discussed proposed sweeping changes to Michigan’s mini-Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) law. Below, we provide an update on the status

Read More »
person looking at their blank phone with their laptop behind them

CEMA Email Litigation Update

As our readers know, Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) has become a fertile battleground for lawsuits involving CEMA email claims. Below, we discuss a

Read More »

Trending Topics

Trending Topics

woman on her laptop on the internet wiretappng for information
Blog

Consent Defeats Wiretapping Claims

As our readers know, the use of internet tracking technologies on consumer-facing websites is widespread. Utilization of these third-party tracking tools, however, has led to

Read More »
guy on this cell phone tcpa michigan
Blog

Michigan Mini-TCPA Update

Readers may recall a piece late last year in which we discussed proposed sweeping changes to Michigan’s mini-Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) law. Below, we provide an update on the status

Read More »
person looking at their blank phone with their laptop behind them
Blog

CEMA Email Litigation Update

As our readers know, Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) has become a fertile battleground for lawsuits involving CEMA email claims. Below, we discuss a

Read More »
person on shopify website wiretapping claim
Blog

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »