NY Senator Introduces “QUIET Act” Targeting Robocalls

July 8, 2015

robocallOn June 25, 2015, the senior Senator of the State of New York, Mr. Charles Schumer, introduced a bill before the United States Senate seeking to pass the “Quell Unnecessary, Intentional, and Encroaching Telephone Calls Act of 2015 (the “QUIET Act”). If passed, the QUIET Act will impose harsh financial penalties, and even the prospect of jail time, for those robocallers which violate its provisions.

What is the QUIET Act?

Schumer Introduces QUIET Act to Stem Robocalls

Bill S.1681, or the QUIET Act, will criminalize (with limited exception) commercial robocalls. The QUIET Act defines commercial robocalls as “a telephone call made for the purpose of soliciting or encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment or enrollment in, property, goods, or services, using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial prerecorded voice.” According to its terms, any person found to have violated the QUIET Act “shall be fined not more than $20,000 per violation, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.”

The QUIET Act does exempt the use of robocalls if prior express written consent is provided by the consumer, or if robocalls are used for emergency purposes or by or on behalf of a tax-exempt nonprofit organization. The QUIET Act also provides an exemption if a robocall is used to deliver a message relating to health care made by, or on behalf of, a covered entity or business associate of a covered entity, as defined by the Code of Federal Regulations.

When introduced, Schumer’s bill was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. We will continue to monitor the progress of the bill and provide updates.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or if you have been served with process concerning your telemarketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

FCC Narrowly Adopts TCPA Declaratory Ruling

Proposed FCC Telemarketing Actions- “Most Significant Since the Do-Not-Call Registry”

FCC Issues Robocall Citations to Three Companies


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

TCPA vicarious tcpa law woman holding cellphone telemarketing laws

TCPA Vicarious Liability

An Illinois federal district court judge recently held that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) may be vicariously liable for alleged Telephone Consumer

Read More »