New York Appeals Court Finds Fantasy Sports Law Unconstitutional

New York Appeals Court Finds Fantasy Sports Law Unconstitutional
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In what is potentially a major setback for the industry, a New York State appellate court recently ruled that the State’s 2016 fantasy sports law violates the State’s constitutional ban on gambling.  Along with striking the portion of the law that legalized and regulated the industry, the court also invalidated the portion of the law that excluded fantasy sports from the State Penal Law’s prohibition against gambling. 

Why was the fantasy sports law found unconstitutional?

The appellate court began its analysis by discussing the State Constitution’s gambling prohibition.  Under the Constitution, with certain enumerated exceptions, “no lottery or the sale of lottery tickets, pool-selling, book-making, or any other kind of gambling” is authorized within New York.  Because the Constitution does not itself define of gambling, the court utilized the definition contained in the State Penal Law. The Penal Law defines gambling as contests in which an individual stakes something of value to receive something of value based upon a certain event, the outcome of which depends to a material degree on chance, notwithstanding that skill may also be a factor.  Employing this definition, the court reasoned that fantasy sports contests constitute gambling and/or games of chance because, although fantasy sports contest “participants may use their skill in selecting teams, they cannot control how the athletes on their [] teams will perform in the real-world sporting events.” In reaching its decision, the court held that the Legislature did not have the authority to override the Constitution by determining, in its own judgement, that fantasy sports contests are not gambling. 

The court also invalidated the portion of the law that excluded fantasy sports from the Penal Law’s prohibition against gambling.  Despite recognizing that an activity can be prohibited but not necessarily criminalized, the court nevertheless concluded that the Legislature would not have intended to decriminalize fantasy sports without the ability to heavily regulate it.  Because the court struck down the Legislature’s regulatory power in this instance, it felt that the most prudent course of action was to, in turn, invalidate the fantasy sports law in its entirety. 

Remaining Compliant with Fantasy Sports Law

The State can, and most likely will, appeal this decision to New York’s highest court.  Were that to happen, it is anticipated that this decision will be stayed, allowing fantasy sports operators to continue offering contests in the State pending the outcome on appeal.  Nevertheless, interested parties face considerable headwinds in New York following this latest setback. This decision serves as a reminder of how the laws and regulations governing fantasy sports continue to grow and evolve across the country.  In such a shifting regulatory climate, it remains imperative to engage competent legal counsel to become/remain compliant with applicable law when setting up or operating fantasy sports contests.

If you are interested in learning more about fantasy sports law or pursuing a fantasy sports venture, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar Blog Posts:

Bachelor Contestants Embroiled in Fantasy Sports Law Controversy

Iowa Fantasy Sports Become Reality

New Jersey Fantasy Sports Operator Settles with State

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin