FTC Settles Negative Option Lawsuit

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

April 18, 2018

negative-option
Negative Option Lawsuit

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) entered into a settlement agreement this week with dozens of related entities and their individual owners in connection with a negative option marketing operation.  The FTC had commenced a lawsuit against the parties alleging that the individual owners operated nearly sixty (60) companies that sold personal care products, including tooth-whitening products, through myriad marketing websites on which trial offers associated with illegal negative option plans were available.  The FTC further alleged that the websites utilized both deceptive claims and misleading disclosures which caused consumers to provide billing information to pay for trial products only to incur recurring monthly fees without their knowledge or consent.

What are the Relevant Terms of the Settlement?

In addition to a judgment of approximately $100,000 (the amount charged to customers without their knowing consent), the companies and their owners agreed to the following future billing and advertising practice prohibitions:

  • Offering to sell or provide any product to a customer in which the customer’s failure to take affirmative action to reject the product or cancel the service is interpreted as acceptance or continuing acceptance of the offer;
  • Misrepresenting any material term of a transaction, including the need to cancel in order to avoid recurring charges; and
  • Failing to provide customers with simple mechanisms to stop the recurring charges.

Protect Yourself from Negative Option Billing Scrutiny

Recurring billing methods provide convenience to both businesses and consumers by doing away with the need to revisit the purchase/payment process each month for a product or service that the consumer plans to use for an extended period of time.  However, continuity billing must be structured and implemented consistent with the law.  The FTC’s settlement in this matter demonstrates that companies which fail to adequately inform their consumers of negative option billing practices are likely to come under regulatory scrutiny.  As such, businesses that either intend to implement, or are otherwise already utilizing, negative option billing practices must be mindful to work closely with experienced counsel to ensure that clear and conspicuous billing disclosures are provided to, and express consent obtained from, customers.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your marketing and billing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

eHarmony Agrees to Settle Automatic Renewal Lawsuit

Online Lingerie Marketer Settles Negative Option Lawsuit with FTC

FTC Hits Marketers with Negative Option Lawsuit

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin