Multi-Level Marketing Programs Vs. Pyramid Schemes

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Th1134525_20538689e distinction between multi-level marketing programs vs. pyramid schemes may seem slight to the casual observer, but the subtle difference between the two will determine if your company is engaging in an illegal activity or not.

Pyramid Schemes vs. Multi-Level Marketing Programs

Most pyramid schemes require that participants pay money in return for two things: 1) the right to sell a product or service; and 2) the right to receive, in return for recruiting other participants into the program, rewards that are unrelated to the sale of the applicable product or service to ultimate retail customers.

Similarly, multi-level marketing programs (“MLMs”) have individuals sell products to the public — often by word of mouth and direct sales, but these individuals, called distributors, are only compensated by earning a commission on their sales.  There are no secondary rewards or bonuses associated with recruiting distributors or for other unrelated activities.  These types of programs are lawful marketing plans, so long as the company maintains its compliance with applicable regulations.

Recent Multi-Level Marketing Programs in the News

As detailed in last Friday’s New York Times, any business entity, even well-respected companies, such as Herbalife®, can erode from being a legitimate MLM to facing financial scrutiny and accusations of operating as a pyramid scheme, unless proper precautions are taken.

How to Maintain a Legitimate Multi-Level Marketing Program

To preserve its legitimacy, MLMs should disclose:

–          The number and percentage of current participants who have not received commissions or bonuses;

–          The median amount of commissions, bonuses and overrides received by all participants, together with the percentage of participants who have received less and those who have received more;

–          The average amount of commissions and bonuses received by all participants; and

–          For each level and rank within the plan, the number and percentage of current participants who have reached that level or rank, and the average length of time it took to reach that level.

Furthermore, MLMs should not, expressly or by implication:

–          Falsely represent the amount of benefits or income that can be, or which is likely to be, derived from participation in the MLM;

–          Falsely represent the amount of sales that any person or persons have made, or that participants can or are likely to make, in the MLM;

–          Make any false or misleading hypothetical MLM earnings claims;

–          Represent that people who fail to make significant income from the MLM are those who do not devote substantial or sufficient effort.

If you are contemplating engaging in an MLM venture, it is advisable that you contact a competent attorney to review the terms of compensation to determine whether the program can confirm its claims about the amount of money distributors can make.  As shown by the Herbalife® situation, regulatory bodies will not hesitate to investigate pyramid scheme accusations and it is a best practice to preemptively protect your company from the time and expense associated with a regulatory action.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or are contemplating engaging in a multi-level marketing campaign, please email us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at 212.246.0900.

Attorney Advertising

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin