Landmark Daily Fantasy Sports Settlement between DraftKings, FanDuel and New York

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

March 21, 2016

fantasy-sportsEarlier today, reports surfaced that the Attorney General for the State of New York had entered into settlement agreements with fantasy sports industry leaders FanDuel and DraftKings in connection with the companies’ respective pending lawsuits with the State.  Given the size of the New York market, the effects of the settlements will likely soon reverberate throughout the industry on a nationwide basis.

What are the key provisions of the State’s settlement with the daily fantasy giants?

FanDuel and DraftKings entered into substantially similar agreements that mandate each of the companies to:

  • Block all people located in New York from entering fantasy sports contests that involve an entry fee, effective immediately;
  • On their respective websites, include New York in the list of states where contestants may not deposit funds or enter paid contests;
  • Process all requests from New York users to withdraw their account balances;
  • Agree to adjourn (until the Fall) the appeals taken from the preliminary injunctions previously entered against the fantasy sports companies;
    • Importantly, the agreement to adjourn the respective appeals seems calculated to delay a decision by the courts in contemplation that the State legislature may ultimately pass legislation in the current session expressly determining the legality of (and prospective regulatory framework for) fantasy sports contests in New York.

Please note that while the settlement agreement purports to resolve the competing arguments regarding the legality of fantasy sports contests generally, at least temporarily, the agreement expressly reserves the State’s claims against the companies for charges of deceptive advertising.  As we have previously written, the State has sued FanDuel and DraftKings for their respective claims concerning contest participants’ ability or likelihood to win fantasy sports contests, claiming the representations to be false and/or misleading.

Avoiding Fantasy Sports-Related Liability

As fantasy sports contests, and the laws and regulations that govern them, continue to grow and evolve, it is essential that fantasy sports enterprises keep abreast of the developing legal landscape.  The New York Attorney General’s settlement with FanDuel and DraftKings makes clear that even while issues regarding the legality of fantasy sports contests remain fluid, regulators are equally concerned with preventing fantasy sports operators from making unsubstantiated or deceptive advertising claims about the products that they offer.  As such, operators should regularly review their respective contest platforms, entry fee, prize structures and marketing materials with knowledgeable counsel in order to effectively navigate the current regulatory landscape.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or pursuing a fantasy sports venture, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Virginia Blazes Trail In Fantasy Sports Regulation

New State-Level Fantasy Sports Regulatory Developments

Fantasy Sports Legal Developments Across the Nation

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

Creating a Viral and Legally Compliant "Pin to Win" Contest- Klein Moynihan Turco

Creating a Viral (And Legally Compliant) “Pin to Win” Contest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We have frequently written about the marketing benefits associated with the use of promotional contests and sweepstakes.  Promotional contests and sweepstakes often appear on social media platforms, which provide companies with a free and effective means to increase the number of consumers participating in their respective contests. While companies must

Facebook Decision defines a TCPA Autodialer- Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Facebook Aftermath: Courts Clarify Definition of TCPA Autodialer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On April 1st, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, marking a newly clarified definition of “autodialer” within the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). In the two weeks that followed, two federal courts have directly addressed the definition of TCPA autodialer as

Critical Role that TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing- KMT

The Critical Role that the TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you’re running any sort of outbound telemarketing campaign – phone calls, voicemail drops, or text messaging – you need to understand the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and its enabling regulations. Call center operators are not the only businesses that employ outbound telemarketing to reach out to consumers. Using

How to Use Promotional Marketing the Legal Way: Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

How To Use Promotional Marketing The Legal Way

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The use of promotional contests, games and sweepstakes marketing can be a dynamic and cost-effective way to increase sales, build a database of interested consumers and otherwise increase brand awareness and buzz. Consumers are more easily attracted to your marketing message by the opportunity to win prizes than with more

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin