Jury Finds Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke Guilty of Copyright Infringement

Share This Post

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on google
Share on email

March 12, 2015

copyright-infringementOn March 20, 2015, a jury awarded $7.4 million to the family of artist Marvin Gaye for Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s alleged infringement of Gaye’s song “Got to Give it Up.”  Gaye’s family alleged that Pharrell and Thicke’s song “Blurred Lines” infringed Gaye’s intellectual property rights.  Although many have viewed the trial as a comparison of the two songs, most testimony during the trial centered around the similarities between certain chords and notes contained in the two songs.  Pharrell and Thicke have not stated whether they plan to appeal the copyright infringement ruling.

Allegations of Copyright Infringement against Pharrell and Thicke

Although the allegation of infringement revolves around Gaye’s “Got to Give it Up,” the evidence at trial focused on the sheet music that Gaye submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  Particularly, experts debated the similarities between Gaye’s sheet music and Pharrell and Thicke’s actual song.  Although Gaye’s sheet music lacked many elements of the final version of “Got to Give it Up,” an expert testifying for Gaye’s family opined that there were at least eight (8) distinct elements from “Got to Give it Up” contained in the song “Blurred Lines.”

Protect Yourself

Intellectual property issues are common in the music industry.  As we have previously blogged, Sirius XM Radio has been defending numerous copyright claims asserted by Flo & Eddie.  It is important that knowledgeable counsel be retained to avoid copyright litigation.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or if you have been served with process concerning intellectual property infringement, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts related to this topic:

Lil Wayne Files 51 Million Music Contract Lawsuit Against Label

New York Court Certifies Sirius XM Copyright Case Interlocutory Appeal

Klein Moynihan Turco Scores Major Trademark Infringement Win

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call

In the Telemarketing or Internet Marketing Industries?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced Lawyer.

Are You Running a Promotion or Advertisement?

Get a free compliance review of your telemarketing or Internet marketing operation.