Jamster Settles FTC Cramming Lawsuit for More than $1 Million

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

blogpost4-17As part of the increased regulatory focus on the mobile marketing space, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought suit against Jesta Digital, LLC, better known as Jamster, alleging mobile telephone bill “cramming” in violation of the FTC Act and other applicable laws.  “Cramming” is the act of placing unauthorized charges on a consumer’s telephone bill – in the present example, mobile telephone bills.  In order to avoid a potentially multi-million dollar judgment, Jamster decided to settle the case.

Details of Alleged Cramming

According to the FTC complaint, Jamster allegedly placed deceptive ads on consumers’ mobile devices while they played the game “Angry Birds” on their mobile devices. The ads falsely claimed that a virus was detected on the consumer’s mobile device and “[w]hen consumers clicked on the ads, [Jamster] presented them with a series of screens or landing pages that included bold and prominent language and visuals about protecting Android mobile devices from viruses . . . .” The FTC alleged that if consumers clicked anywhere on the screens or landing pages, Jamster would charge them a recurring $9.99 monthly fee, which was placed directly on their mobile bill.

The FTC claims that Jamster and its operators have taken advantage of the fact that consumers may not expect their mobile phone bills to contain charges from third parties. As a result, the FTC allege that many consumers did not notice or understand the charges and paid the bills, and to the extent that consumers did notice the charges, the process of obtaining refunds was difficult and often unsuccessful according to the complaint.

Jamster Settlement Terms

The proposed settlement order contains the following requirements that Jamster must abide by:

  1. Refrain from placing deceptive ads regarding viruses and anti-virus software or making any misleading statements regarding the cost of goods or services;
  2. Receive and maintain express verifiable authorization from consumers before placing any charges on their mobile phone bills;
  3. Provide full refunds to consumers who were billed for the malware programs between Dec. 8, 2011 and the date of entry of the settlement order; and
  4. Pay a penalty fee of $1.2 million to the FTC for violating the FTC Act.

The complaint against Jamster is part of a larger trend of regulatory action within the mobile space.  In light of this action, and the general regulatory trend, mobile service providers that bill for services by and through consumers’ mobile telephone bills should immediately review their marketing practices (and those of their affiliates) and consumer disclosures in order to ensure compliance with the FTC’s guidance and to avoid allegations of cramming.  Entities that fail to comply with applicable law in this vertical could find themselves facing regulatory action from the FTC, which could result in significant fines being levied.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your mobile billing practices, affiliate marketing agreements and/or update your consumer disclosures based on this FTC action, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

Attorney Advertising

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin