Health Insurance Marketer Settles FTC Deceptive Marketing Practices Lawsuit

July 22, 2016

deceptive-marketingThe Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) recently prevailed in a deceptive marketing practices investigation involving Partners In Health Care Association (“PIHC”) and its owner.  The judgment obtained by the FTC provides for, among other things, a monetary penalty of nearly $9 million and a prohibition against PIHC and its owner from selling healthcare products, as well as any future telemarketing of any good or service.

What was the nature of PIHC’s alleged deceptive marketing campaign?

The FTC had accused PIHC of running a marketing campaign in which it sold medical discount cards to consumers under the false pretense that PIHC was actually selling health insurance.  PIHC was alleged to have targeted the most vulnerable consumers in need of health insurance through telemarketing, Spanish-language radio advertisements, television advertisements and Internet ads.  PIHC was also accused of falsely claiming that its health insurance plans provided comprehensive insurance at a low cost, luring consumers into paying an upfront enrollment fee and a monthly payment which could cost up to several hundred dollars.  It was only upon receipt of the written materials describing the purchased product (which was often received after the time to receive a refund had lapsed) that most consumers realized that PIHC had not actually sold them health insurance.

Best Practices to Avoid a Deceptive Marketing Practices Lawsuit

As we have previously blogged, federal authorities and state attorneys general alike have been active in investigating and prosecuting companies for deceptive advertising and marketing practices.   Though the foregoing example may involve more sinister motives than those of the typical marketer, the vigorous efforts of the FTC nevertheless serve to reinforce the reality that it is necessary to provide accurate representations in the marketing of any good or service.  Advertisers face a wide range of legal risks in today’s regulatory climate.  Therefore, before undertaking a marketing campaign, it is imperative to engage knowledgeable counsel to ensure that your marketing practices and procedures are fully compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, need to review your marketing practices and procedures or if you are facing an investigation from a state attorney general or other regulatory agency, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

FTC Settles Deceptive Business Practices Lawsuit

Retailer Settles FTC Deceptive Advertising Claims for Product Endorsements on Instagram

Subway Settles Sandwich Length Deceptive Trade Practices Lawsuit

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »

Trending Topics

Blog

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »