FTC Settles with Data Broker

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

December 5, 2016

data-brokerOn November 30, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced a settlement with Jason A. Kotzker, the purported owner and member of two separate data broker companies: Sequoia One, LLC and Gen X Marketing Group, LLC.  Kotzker was the final defendant to settle an action commenced by the FTC last August.  According to the FTC’s complaint, in some instances, Kotzker’s companies purchased payday loan applications from websites that offered to help consumers find payday lenders.  In other instances, it was alleged, Kotzker’s companies established phony websites offering to match consumers looking for payday loans with lenders.  In all instances, Kotzker’s companies obtained consumer personally identifiable information including social security numbers.  Instead of connecting these consumers with payday lenders, Kotzker’s companies sold the applications to non-lender third parties.  According to the FTC, those third parties fraudulently withdrew funds from consumer bank accounts for financial services products that were never purchased by the affected consumers.  As a result, the FTC sued Kotzker, his companies, and other partners for violation of the FTC Act.  Kotzker’s companies previously defaulted, and the other individually named defendants have settled.

What are the Terms of the FTC’s Settlement with the Data Broker?

Terms of Settlement with Data Broker

According to the terms of the settlement agreement, Kotzker is permanently enjoined from selling the personal information of consumers.  Additionally, Kotzker is prohibited from making any misrepresentations concerning any financial or other product or service in the future.  The FTC obtained a judgment in excess of $7 million against Kotzker.  However, because of his represented inability to pay, all but $45,000 of the judgment awarded has been suspended.

Protect Yourself

FTC scrutiny of financial-related product and service companies has intensified.  We recently blogged about an FTC campaign to shut down 13 separate debt relief organizations.  In this regulatory climate, it is imperative that businesses offering consumers financial products and services review their marketing and information collection practices with experienced and competent counsel.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Privacy and Data Security practice area of our website.  If you have been served with process concerning your business practices in general, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

Affiliate Marketing Network Held Liable for its Publisher’s Deceptive Content

CFPB Proposes New Payday Lending Rules

Google Bans AdWords Ads for Payday Loans

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

Creating a Viral and Legally Compliant "Pin to Win" Contest- Klein Moynihan Turco

Creating a Viral (And Legally Compliant) “Pin to Win” Contest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We have frequently written about the marketing benefits associated with the use of promotional contests and sweepstakes.  Promotional contests and sweepstakes often appear on social media platforms, which provide companies with a free and effective means to increase the number of consumers participating in their respective contests. While companies must

Facebook Decision defines a TCPA Autodialer- Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Facebook Aftermath: Courts Clarify Definition of TCPA Autodialer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On April 1st, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, marking a newly clarified definition of “autodialer” within the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). In the two weeks that followed, two federal courts have directly addressed the definition of TCPA autodialer as

Critical Role that TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing- KMT

The Critical Role that the TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you’re running any sort of outbound telemarketing campaign – phone calls, voicemail drops, or text messaging – you need to understand the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and its enabling regulations. Call center operators are not the only businesses that employ outbound telemarketing to reach out to consumers. Using

How to Use Promotional Marketing the Legal Way: Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

How To Use Promotional Marketing The Legal Way

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The use of promotional contests, games and sweepstakes marketing can be a dynamic and cost-effective way to increase sales, build a database of interested consumers and otherwise increase brand awareness and buzz. Consumers are more easily attracted to your marketing message by the opportunity to win prizes than with more

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin