FTC Secures Settlement in Deceptive Mortgage Advertising Suit

Home » Blog »

Share:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Get a Free Compliance Review

Our trusted legal counsel can help ensure your business stays compliant.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1316747_53964704On June 6, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered a Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Civil Penalty Judgment (the “Order”) against Heritage Homes Group, Inc. and a number of related companies (“Heritage”) and in favor of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”).  The FTC alleged in a complaint filed on June 4, 2014, that Heritage misled consumers concerning certain mortgages that it advertised in connection with the purchase of homes.  The FTC used its power under the Mortgage Acts and Practices Advertising Rule (the “MAP” Rule) and “Regulation N” to bring its action against Heritage.

Heritage’s Alleged Deceptive Mortgage Advertising

In its Complaint, the FTC alleged that “[s]ince at least August 19, 2011, [Heritage had] made numerous commercial communications offering prominently, among other things, ‘ZIP. ZERO. NADA.,’ ‘$0 Money Down,’ and ‘$0 For Paid Closing Costs.’  In fact, the program and financing offered by [Heritage] requires consumers to pay a minimum deposit of up to $2,000 at contract signing, a funding fee of 2%, an annual fee of .4% of the loan at settlement, and other charges.”  Perhaps most troubling, Heritage offered home financing through the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) Rural Development Loan Program (“Rural Loan Program”) without adequately disclosing the program’s qualifying restrictions.  Instead, at best, Heritage occasionally published advertising that advised “restrictions apply,” but failed to include detail as to what those restrictions were.

The Settlement

As part of its settlement for deceptive mortgage advertising, Heritage agreed to be enjoined from “misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, any term of any mortgage credit product.”  Additionally, Heritage is now prohibited from failing to maintain certain evidence of compliance with the Order.  Heritage has a 20 year reporting requirement, and agreed to a judgment totaling Six Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($650,000.00), which has been suspended pending financial verification.

Protect Yourself

The FTC has been cracking down on what it perceives as “deceptive advertising” in general, and “deceptive mortgage advertising” in particular.  With the regulatory environment becoming more restrictive every day, it is increasingly important that companies approach their business practices with caution, and consult competent counsel to review all associated marketing practices. 

If you are interested in discussing your marketing practices, or if you have been served with legal process relating to your advertising, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Trending Topics

SMS Text Messages and the TCPA- Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
Blog

SMS Text Messaging and the TCPA

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Short Message Service (SMS) text messaging has become a ubiquitous form of communication for people over the last decade.  Consequently, marketers and advertisers who are

Read More »