First Criminal Prosecution Under Amended Arizona Telemarketing Law

February 1, 2017

arizona-telemarketingLast week, Arizona State resident Lukeroy Rose became the first person to plead guilty to an alleged criminal violation of a recently amended Arizona telemarketing law.

How can telemarketers and text message marketers stay legally compliant in Arizona?

Arizona Telemarketing Law Amendments

Arizona telemarketing laws and regulatory enforcement practices are some of the strictest in the country.  For example, a seller, telemarketer or text message marketer’s failure to file a verified or limited registration statement with the Secretary of State (as applicable) or otherwise qualify for an exemption is a Class 5 felony in the State of Arizona.

In August 2016, the Arizona Legislature passed Senate Bill 1375, which expanded the Arizona State definition of “telephone solicitation” to include calls made from within the State to out-of-state consumers.

Telemarketer Criminally Prosecuted in Arizona

In May 2016, following an investigation by the United States Postal Inspection Service, Lukeroy Rose was indicted by an Arizona State grand jury for alleged conspiracy, money laundering, fraud and other criminal charges in connection with the telemarketing practices of his company, Rose Marketing, LLC.  The Arizona telemarketing law was amended while Rose’s case was pending.

In December 2016, while Rose was released from custody on bond, the Arizona State Attorney General’s Office Special Investigations Section conducted undercover surveillance and determined that Rose had made additional telemarketing calls that allegedly violated the recently amended Arizona telemarketing law.  Rose was arrested again and held without bond.

On January 25, 2017, Rose pleaded guilty to “Unlawful Telephone Solicitations” and a number of other criminal counts.  Under Rose’s plea agreement, he will be sentenced on February 23 to five years in prison.

Protect Yourself Before You Call or Text

As the above-referenced case illustrates, telemarketers and text message marketers that launch marketing campaigns within the State of Arizona without the requisite licensure face substantial legal risk, including possible criminal prosecution.  Sellers and their marketing affiliates are advised to consult experienced telemarketing counsel before making calls or delivering text messages from or into the State of Arizona.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, need to review your telemarketing or text message marketing practices, or if you are being investigated by a state or federal regulatory agency, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Beware: TCPA Compliant Telemarketers May Still Face Liability for Robocalls

Connecticut State Law Increases Penalties for TCPA Violations

New Jersey Relaxes Do Not Call Law

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »

Trending Topics

Blog

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff’s prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding

Read More »