Federal Court of Appeals Upholds Injunction Against Multi-Level Marketing Business

1134525_20538689On June 2, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a permanent injunction awarded to the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) against multi-level marketer BurnLounge, Inc.  The injunction, issued by the district court in 2012, barred BournLounge from continuing its business operations.  The Court upheld the district court’s ruling that BurnLounge was, in fact, an illegal pyramid scheme because it offered rewards that were primarily paid for recruitment of individuals into the business rather than for the sale of goods.  In its decision, the Court expounded on factors to be considered when deciding whether a multi-level marketing business is lawful or nothing more than a pyramid scheme.

Two-Prong Test to Determine Pyramid Scheme

In upholding the injunction against BurnLounge, the Court reiterated its two-prong test used to determine the lawfulness of a multi-level marketing business.  “A pyramid scheme is ‘characterized by the payment by participants of money to the company in return for which they receive (1) the right to sell a product and (2) the right to receive in return for recruiting other participants into the program rewards which are unrelated to the sale of the product to ultimate users.’”  The Court held that not only was recruiting built into the compensation structure for members to be eligible for cash rewards, but selling packages was “the only form of recruitment” offered by BurnLounge.  Quoting a previous decision, the Court held that “‘[t]he promise of lucrative rewards for recruiting others tends to induce participants to focus on the recruitment side of the business at the expense of their retail marketing efforts, making it unlikely that meaningful opportunities for retail sales will occur.’”  To support its holding, the Court pointed to the fact that after BurnLounge entered into a voluntary preliminary injunction at the start of the case, stopping BurnLounge from offering the ability to earn cash rewards for recruitment, its revenues plummeted.  The Court stated “[t]he dramatic decline in revenue after the ability to earn cash rewards was eliminated provides further evidence that the sale of BurnLounge packages was primarily directed at participants who were interested in the [recruitment] program, where it was possible to earn cash rewards.”

Rewards Do Not Have to Be “Completely” Unrelated to Find Pyramid Scheme

In prosecuting its appeal, BurnLounge argued that because its rewards program had some tangential relationship to the sale of products, its platform should not have been held to be a pyramid scheme.  The Court rejected this argument.  The Court ruled that the actual practices of the business must be considered.  In plain terms, the decision noted that “courts . . . have consistently found [multi-level marketing] businesses to be illegal pyramids where their focus was on recruitment and where rewards were paid in exchange for recruiting others, rather than simply selling products.”  In this case, the Court found that rewards were primarily paid for recruitment and not for the sale of products.  The Court quoted from an FTC letter which stated, in part, that “[t]he critical question for the FTC is whether the revenues that primarily support the commissions paid to all participants are generated from purchases of goods and services that are not simply incidental to the purchase of the right to participate in a money-making venture.”    Because the rewards BurnLounge paid to its members were primarily in return for selling the right to participate in the money-making venture, the merchandise in the packages was simply incidental.

Protect Yourself

We have previously delineated key differences between multi-level marketing businesses and pyramid schemes.  (Multi-Level Marketing Programs vs. Pyramid Schemes).  Additionally, in January of this year, we wrote about the FTC’s investigation of multi-level marketer Herbalife.  (United States Senator Seeks Investigation into Alleged Pyramid Scheme).  In this regulatory climate, it is critical that multi-level marketing ventures seek competent counsel to advise them on their business practices in order to avoid being deemed illegal pyramid schemes. 

If you are interested in setting up a multi-level marketing program, or if you have been served with legal process relating to your multi-level marketing practices, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

TCPA vicarious tcpa law woman holding cellphone telemarketing laws

TCPA Vicarious Liability

An Illinois federal district court judge recently held that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) may be vicariously liable for alleged Telephone Consumer

Read More »