Court Says that Ringless Voicemail Messages are TCPA Calls

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In a ruling that will have far reaching implications, a federal court in Michigan recently found that ringless voicemail messages are calls for purposes of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”).

What are ringless voicemails and why did the Court rule that they are TCPA calls?

Questions about trademark law?

Call us today at (212) 246-0900.

Our initial consultations are free.

Ringless Voicemail

Ringless voicemail technology, generally speaking, allows callers to bypass calling a person’s cell phone number directly, and instead sends messages through to the voicemail service provider’s platform and, ultimately, to the subscriber.  The argument that the defendant posited in this action was that by allowing a voicemail to be delivered without ever having a person’s phone actually ring, such a form of contact could not be considered a call subject to the restrictions of the TCPA.  We have previously advised clients that this argument would not likely be successful before courts or regulators.  The federal court in Michigan agreed.  It concluded that because the phone’s subscriber receives a notification that s/he has a voicemail message, the effect of the ringless voicemail is the same as if the phone had rang before the voicemail was delivered.  As a result, the Court found that ringless voicemails are calls for TCPA purposes and that the company which placed these messages may be held liable for such conduct.

Please note that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has yet to opine on the legality of ringless voicemail.  Despite being petitioned on multiple prior occasions to issue its opinion as to whether ringless voicemails constitute calls for purposes of the TCPA, the agency, thus far, has declined to do so.

Take Steps to Avoid a Ringless Voicemail TCPA Lawsuit

In the post-ACA International regulatory environment, interested parties continue to look to the FCC for guidance on a host of TCPA-related issues including whether relatively new communications technology, such as ringless voicemail, falls within the scope of the TCPA.  As long as the FCC opts not to offer its opinion on these matters, however, it is inevitable that the issues will continue to be addressed by courts of law, which may lead to a hodgepodge of rulings for the foreseeable future.  As a result, it is critical that when sending ringless voicemail, proper protocols are complied with in order to obtain prior express written consent prior to contacting cell phones.  The rapid pace of innovation in the telemarketing space, and the affect that such innovation has on the exposure to TCPA liability for those who use it, make it critically important that marketers work closely with knowledgable counsel prior to launching any campaign using pioneering communications technology, such as ringless voicemail.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your telemarketing practices, please e-mail us at, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

TCPA Lawsuit Tests Definition of ATDS

Senators Seek Consumer Friendly TCPA Law Protections in Letter to FCC

GoDaddy Did Not Use an Autodialer, TCPA Case Dismissed

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin