Contest Prizes, Endorsements and Testimonials: A Lesson from Lumosity

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

January 7, 2016

contest-prizesThis Monday, “brain training” company Lumos Labs, Inc. D/B/A “Lumosity” agreed to pay $2 million to settle Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) claims of deceptive advertising. The FTC’s allegations were brought in part because of Lumosity customer testimonials that were purportedly submitted as a condition to enter promotional contests for a chance to win contest prizes.

Can businesses incentivize customer testimonials with sweepstakes and contest prizes?

Lumosity Brain Training Program

Lumosity provides “brain training” video games via its mobile application and the lumosity.com website. The Lumosity program is widely advertised through a number of consumer channels. As we reported earlier this week, the FTC sued Lumosity this Monday in federal district court in San Francisco (Case No. 3:16-cv-00001-sk) for alleged deceptive advertising violations.

Contest Prizes for Customer Testimonials

Among other things, the Commission alleged that certain Lumosity marketing materials featured 160 testimonials provided by Lumosity users, which promoted a wide range of supposed Lumosity program-related benefits, such as improved school, work and athletic performance. According to court documents filed by the FTC, 46 of Lumosity’s featured testimonials were submitted by individuals in exchange for a chance to win contest prizes, such as a free iPad, a lifetime Lumosity subscription and a trip to San Francisco. In one such Lumosity contest, consumers were eligible to receive contest prizes for answering each of the following questions in a YouTube video:

  • What is your first and last name?
  • How long have you been using Lumosity?
  • How has Lumosity helped you live a better life?
  • Why do you recommend Lumosity to others?

The Commission alleged that Lumosity failed to adequately disclose to prospective consumers the fact that contest entrants were asked to answer these questions, which could have affected the weight and credibility consumers assigned to such testimonials.

FTC and Lumosity Settle Deceptive Advertising Claims

Under the terms of the settlement agreement announced on January 4, 2016, Lumosity has agreed to pay the Commission $2 million to redress consumer injuries. Additionally, Lumosity must clearly and conspicuously disclose any material connections between itself and its endorsement providers, such as the use of contest prizes to solicit testimonials and product endorsements.

Avoiding Liability in Connection with Advertising Campaigns

Broadly speaking, FTC regulations require advertisers to disclose all financial interests that testimonial providers may receive in connection with providing testimonials or product endorsements. Operators of sweepstakes and promotional contests must ensure that entrants (and, in some instances, the operators themselves) include prominent disclosures adequately detailing the prospective benefits that entrants receive in connection with their subject endorsement, testimonial or other promotional efforts. Failure to do so could result in regulatory action or other adverse legal consequences. In this regulatory climate, it is recommended that advertisers retain qualified legal counsel before commencing any promotion, contest or sweepstakes.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or pursuing a promotional contest- or sweepstakes-related venture, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Lumosity Settles FTC Lawsuit for $2 Million

Sweepstakes Endorsements and Testimonials: What’s Not to Like?

FTC Settles Charges of Illegal Paid Testimonials

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin