Contest Prizes, Endorsements and Testimonials: A Lesson from Lumosity

January 7, 2016

contest-prizesThis Monday, “brain training” company Lumos Labs, Inc. D/B/A “Lumosity” agreed to pay $2 million to settle Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) claims of deceptive advertising. The FTC’s allegations were brought in part because of Lumosity customer testimonials that were purportedly submitted as a condition to enter promotional contests for a chance to win contest prizes.

Can businesses incentivize customer testimonials with sweepstakes and contest prizes?

Lumosity Brain Training Program

Lumosity provides “brain training” video games via its mobile application and the website. The Lumosity program is widely advertised through a number of consumer channels. As we reported earlier this week, the FTC sued Lumosity this Monday in federal district court in San Francisco (Case No. 3:16-cv-00001-sk) for alleged deceptive advertising violations.

Contest Prizes for Customer Testimonials

Among other things, the Commission alleged that certain Lumosity marketing materials featured 160 testimonials provided by Lumosity users, which promoted a wide range of supposed Lumosity program-related benefits, such as improved school, work and athletic performance. According to court documents filed by the FTC, 46 of Lumosity’s featured testimonials were submitted by individuals in exchange for a chance to win contest prizes, such as a free iPad, a lifetime Lumosity subscription and a trip to San Francisco. In one such Lumosity contest, consumers were eligible to receive contest prizes for answering each of the following questions in a YouTube video:

  • What is your first and last name?
  • How long have you been using Lumosity?
  • How has Lumosity helped you live a better life?
  • Why do you recommend Lumosity to others?

The Commission alleged that Lumosity failed to adequately disclose to prospective consumers the fact that contest entrants were asked to answer these questions, which could have affected the weight and credibility consumers assigned to such testimonials.

FTC and Lumosity Settle Deceptive Advertising Claims

Under the terms of the settlement agreement announced on January 4, 2016, Lumosity has agreed to pay the Commission $2 million to redress consumer injuries. Additionally, Lumosity must clearly and conspicuously disclose any material connections between itself and its endorsement providers, such as the use of contest prizes to solicit testimonials and product endorsements.

Avoiding Liability in Connection with Advertising Campaigns

Broadly speaking, FTC regulations require advertisers to disclose all financial interests that testimonial providers may receive in connection with providing testimonials or product endorsements. Operators of sweepstakes and promotional contests must ensure that entrants (and, in some instances, the operators themselves) include prominent disclosures adequately detailing the prospective benefits that entrants receive in connection with their subject endorsement, testimonial or other promotional efforts. Failure to do so could result in regulatory action or other adverse legal consequences. In this regulatory climate, it is recommended that advertisers retain qualified legal counsel before commencing any promotion, contest or sweepstakes.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or pursuing a promotional contest- or sweepstakes-related venture, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

Lumosity Settles FTC Lawsuit for $2 Million

Sweepstakes Endorsements and Testimonials: What’s Not to Like?

FTC Settles Charges of Illegal Paid Testimonials


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

data CIPA law Swigert law consumer protection data on cumputer screen

Swigart Law Group CIPA Demands

Readers of this blog likely know about the wave of consumer privacy litigation directed at online companies’ collection of consumer data. A litany of these

Read More »