Conde Nast Faces Class Action Lawsuit for Sale of Personally Identifiable Information

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

July 23, 2015

personally identifiable informationOn Monday, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., d/b/a Conde Nast (“Conde Nast”), alleging that the magazine publisher sells the personally identifiable information (“PII”) of its customers to third-party “data miners” in violation of Michigan State law. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Conde Nast has violated Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act (“VRPA”) prohibition against companies disclosing without permission any record or information concerning a Michigan customer’s purchase of written materials, if the record contains PII. According to the complaint, Conde Nast sold lists containing PII at a rate of approximately $180 per thousand subscribers. The complaint seeks to certify a class of all Michigan residents who had their PII disclosed to third parties by Conde Nast without consent.

Does Selling PII Without Customer Consent Violate Michigan Law?

Conde Naste Sued for Selling Personally Identifiable Information

According to the complaint, the named plaintiff is a Conde Nast magazine subscriber. The plaintiff alleges that he was never provided with written notice that Conde Nast sells its customers’ PII and failed to provide a means of opting-out from such practices. The complaint further alleges that “[c]onsumers can sign up for Conde Nast subscriptions through numerous media outlets . . . . Regardless of how the consumer subscribes, Conde Nast never requires the individual to read or agree to any terms of service, privacy policy, or information-sharing policy.” This practice, according to the complaint, violates Michigan’s VRPA.

The VRPA, passed in or about 1988, states in part that: “a person, or an employee or agent of the person, engaged in the business of selling at retail, renting, or lending books or other written materials . . . shall not disclose to any person, other than the customer, a record or information concerning the purchase . . . of those materials by a customer that indicates the identity of the customer.” The complaint seeks to enjoin Conde Nast from violating that provision of the VRPA, as well as disgorgement of all profits made by Conde Nast from the sale of customer PII or $5,000.00 per class member, whichever is greater. Conde Nast must respond to the complaint next month.

Protect Yourself

The class action complaint filed against Conde Nast alleges that it sold customer PII without disclosing such practices in its terms of service or privacy policy, and did not make an information sharing policy available to prospective and existing subscribers. While laws regulating the sale of PII may vary from state to state, providing conspicuous disclosures and obtaining consumer prior express informed consent before selling such data is always a must.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or if you have been served with process concerning your data sharing practices, please e-mail us at or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

FTC Recommends Congress Adopt Sweeping Legislation Aimed at Data Brokers

Google Wins Dismissal of Privacy Policy Lawsuit

Mobile Tracking Service Provider Settles Privacy Policy Violation Claims

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

New York Sweepstakes Law blog- Klein Moynihan Turco

New York Sweepstakes Law: Are You Compliant?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In general, a lottery exists when entrants pay for the chance to win a prize. States alone reserve the right to administer lotteries. Businesses can eliminate one element of what would otherwise be an illegal lottery, in order to transform it into a legal promotional game. If the requirement to

TCPA surveys

An Ad or not an Ad: NY Weighs in on TCPA Surveys

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Another day, another court decision that refines constitutes a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) unsolicited fax advertisement. A Manhattan-based federal court recently issued a decision that removes faxed invitations to participate in a survey from the TCPA definition of advertisement. In drawing this distinction for TCPA surveys, the Court held

NY sports gambling law- Klein Moynihan Turco

Agreement Reached to Enact NY Sports Gambling Law

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This week, Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature agreed to a budget deal that will bring mobile sports betting to the State through a unique NY sports gambling law.  Upon the Governor’s signature, NY sports gambling is primed to become the nation’s largest market. However, New York

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

UK and US Social Media Influencer Laws

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In September of 2020, the United Kingdom’s (“UK”) Committee of Advertising Practice (“CAP”) reviewed the Instagram accounts of 122 UK-based social media influencers to determine whether content was being properly flagged as advertising in accordance with applicable social media influencer laws. This past March, the UK Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”)

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin