Class Certification Denied in Fax Lawsuit

April 16, 2018

Fax Lawsuit

In a fax lawsuit involving allegations against AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Mobility National Accounts LLC (“AT&T”) for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), a federal judge in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut recently denied a motion for class certification brought by the former corporate owner of a Super 8 Motel, a franchisee of Wyndham Hotel Group (the “Franchisee”).

Why was class certification denied in this fax lawsuit?

This fax lawsuit originated from faxes advertising discount cellular telephone services sent by AT&T to franchisees of Wyndham Hotel Group.  The contact information used to send those faxes came from the franchisees themselves which, according to AT&T, was provided with the expectation that AT&T would contact them at such fax numbers.  Notwithstanding this fact, the Plaintiff Franchisee sought to certify a class of AT&T fax recipients alleging that the subject faxes failed to comply with statutory and regulatory opt-out requirements.

The Court was not persuaded that this was an appropriate case to certify as a class action.  Specifically, in reaching its decision, the Court cited to binding precedent established in the 2017 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley v. FCC, in which the Solicited Fax Rule was invalidated.  The D.C. Circuit Court had ruled in that proceeding that the FCC did not have the necessary authority to require opt-out notices on solicited fax advertisements.  Given this authority, the legality of the opt-out notices at issue in the present matter, according to the Court, depends on whether or not the subject fax that each franchise received was solicited.  Due to the fact that individual inquires would be required to determine whether a given fax was solicited, the Court concluded that class certification would be improper.

The Franchisee that brought the fax lawsuit has sought to stay the remaining portions of the action (of which only an individual TCPA claim survived) so that it can appeal the adverse decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Protect Your Business from a TCPA Fax Lawsuit

We have previously blogged about TCPA-related liability resulting from non-compliant fax marketing practices.  As readers of this blog are well-aware, the TCPA regulatory mandates are intricate, nuanced, and technical.  As the marketing industry has learned, the cost of non-compliance with these mandates can be devastating.  Accordingly, it is imperative that businesses operating in this space work closely with knowledgeable counsel prior to engaging in any fax marketing campaign.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, need to review your fax marketing practices and procedures or if you are the subject of a TCPA lawsuit, please e-mail us at, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Similar blog posts:

What is an Advertisement in a TCPA Fax Case?

TCPA Law – FCC Eliminates Opt-Out Notice Requirement for Solicited Faxes

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear TCPA Fax Case


David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Trending Topics

FTSA florida FTSA standing man holding phone telemarketing telemarketers

FTSA Standing

Readers of our blog may recall a recent article in which we discussed two Florida class action lawsuits that significantly limited telemarketing companies’ exposure in

Read More »