CASL Consent Requirements

can-spamDespite the fact that Canada’s Anti-Spam Law (“CASL”) was enacted almost three (3) years ago, its implementing regulations just went into effect on July 1, 2014.

CASL Generally

In comparison to the CAN-SPAM Act, CASL is a much more restrictive law, encompassing a wider variety of communications.  While the CAN-SPAM Act only targets communications sent via e-mail, CASL regulates any electronic message delivered in connection with a commercial purpose, whether or not the person who transmits the message does so with the expectation of earning a profit.  This includes almost all messages sent electronically, including e-mail, text messages and social media messages that endeavor to communicate, market or sell products and/or services to Canadians.

Most importantly for our readers is the fact that CASL’s regulations apply to all commercial electronic messages (“CEM”) received within Canada, regardless of where they are sent from.  This means that United States marketers could be held liable for CASL violations.

CASL Consent Requirements

We have written extensively about the CAN-SPAM Act and its consent requirements. In this post, we highlight the fact that the consent requirements under CASL differ significantly from those of CAN-SPAM.  In contract to CAN-SPAM, which simply requires consumers to “opt-out” of receiving commercial e-mails, CASL restricts the sending of any CEMs, unless consumers have “opted-in” to receiving the CEMs and provided their CASL-compliant express or implied consent.

CASL Express Consent

Express consent under CASL must be clearly and simply indicated.  Those seeking to gain express consent must make clear to the recipient the full corporate names of the entities seeking consent, including their mailing addresses and either a contact telephone number, email address or web address.  Additionally, the consent language must include a statement informing the recipient that he/she can withdraw consent at any time by using the contact information provided.

As a best practice, it is recommended that entities seeking consent ensure that consumers indicate their consent by taking some type of affirmative action, such as entering their e-mail addresses or phone numbers or checking an unpopulated box adjacent to the consent language.  Proof of consent should be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years to avoid liability under CASL.

CASL Implied Consent

Consent under CASL will be implied under three (3) circumstances:

  1. when there is a prior business relationship between the sender and recipient consummated within the last two (2) years;
  2. when the recipient has conspicuously published his or her electronic contact information, without including a statement that he or she does not wish to receive CEMs; and/or
  3. when the recipient has disclosed his or her electronic contact information directly to the sender, without indicating that he or she does not wish to receive CEMs.

Due to enforcement implications that can extend outside the borders of Canada, businesses that conduct e-mail, text message and/or social media marketing throughout North America should take heed of CASL’s regulations.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please refer to our CASL white paper and/or feel free to e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
guy on this cell phone tcpa michigan

Michigan Mini-TCPA Update

Readers may recall a piece late last year in which we discussed proposed sweeping changes to Michigan’s mini-Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) law. Below, we provide an update on the status

Read More »
person looking at their blank phone with their laptop behind them

CEMA Email Litigation Update

As our readers know, Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) has become a fertile battleground for lawsuits involving CEMA email claims. Below, we discuss a

Read More »
person on shopify website wiretapping claim

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »

Trending Topics

Trending Topics

guy on this cell phone tcpa michigan
Blog

Michigan Mini-TCPA Update

Readers may recall a piece late last year in which we discussed proposed sweeping changes to Michigan’s mini-Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) law. Below, we provide an update on the status

Read More »
person looking at their blank phone with their laptop behind them
Blog

CEMA Email Litigation Update

As our readers know, Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act (“CEMA”) has become a fertile battleground for lawsuits involving CEMA email claims. Below, we discuss a

Read More »
person on shopify website wiretapping claim
Blog

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »