prop 65 warning

California Prop 65 Warning to be Amended?

On January 8, 2021, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) proposed to amend the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly known as Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”). In 2016, OEHHA adopted new Article 6 Clear and Reasonable Warnings regulations, providing manufacturers with a “short-form” warning alternative that did not require manufacturers to identify any chemicals on their respective labels. Although it may have been OEHHA’s intention that short-form warnings were to be used only on products with limited label space, Prop 65 allowed manufacturers to use short-form warnings on all products, regardless of label size. The proposed amendments to the Prop 65 warning are an attempt to provide clarification to businesses that have made inquiries concerning the Article 6 labeling requirements, and to explain whether the short-form warnings may be used for food products. 

What are the Prop 65 warning amendments? 

Prop 65 Warnings

“Proposition 65 requires businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to chemicals that cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.” At least once a year, the State of California publishes a list of chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm. Currently, the list contains approximately 900 chemicals, including additives and ingredients in pesticides, common household products, food, drugs, dyes and solvents. OEHHA requires businesses to provide warnings on their products if they may be exposing individuals to these chemicals, “unless the exposure is low enough to pose no significant risk of cancer or is significantly below levels observed to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm.” The short-form warning may be displayed as follows: WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm – www.P65Warnings.ca.gov.

Proposed Amendments

To provide clarification to businesses concerning the use of short-form Prop 65 warnings, OEHHA has proposed the following amendments: 1) Short-form warnings may only be used on products with five (5) square inches or less of label space; 2) Internet and catalogue sales may no longer utilize short-form warnings; and 3) the name of at least one chemical must be used in the text of short-form warnings. Additionally, the proposed amendments clarify that short-form warnings may be used on food products

Prop 65 Enforcement

Prop 65 is enforced by the California State Attorney General’s Office, district and city attorneys, as well as private citizens. Penalties for violating Prop 65 can be as high as $2,500 per violation per day. 

Written Comment Period

The State of California requires governmental agencies to provide notice of all proposed regulatory modifications and a period for public comment. OEHHA has asked for written comments on the proposed Prop 65 amendments to be received by no later than March 8, 2021. OEHHA is providing a longer period for public comment than is typical because it is short-staffed due to COVID-19. 

If you are interested in learning more about Prop 65 warnings, need to review your product packaging, or if you are the subject of a Prop 65 lawsuit, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900. 

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney. 

Attorney Advertising

Related Blog Posts:

The Importance of Accurate PPE Marketing

Businesses Continue to Violate PPE Advertising Regulations

Sanitizer Law During a Pandemic

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
person on shopify website wiretapping claim

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »

Trending Topics

Trending Topics

person on shopify website wiretapping claim
Blog

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls
Blog

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »
phone on table with reflection opt out tcpa telemarketing
Blog

New Effective Date for TCPA Opt-Out Rule!

Although originally adopted on February 16, 2024, the Federal Communications Commission again has decided to delay the effective date of its opt-out regulation until January 31, 2027. We discuss the reasoning for the most recent delay below.   TCPA Opt-Out Regulation Delayed, Again 

Read More »